可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式,您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本,以获取对此功能的支持,访问下面的网站,获取关于浏览器的信息:
[1] MooreAD. Innovationsin practice-mechanical or manual compression: Dose it make a difference?[J].Rn Montvale,1998,61:20-22
[2] Koch KT,Piek JJ. Two hour ambulation after coronary angioplasty and stenting with 6F guiding catheters and low dose heparin[J]. Heart, 1999,81:53-56.
[3]Eidt JF,Haibipour S.Surgical complications from hemostatic puncture closure device [J].Am J Surg,1999,178:511-516.
[4] Simon A, Bumgarner B. Manual versus mechanical compression for femoral artery hempstasis after cardiac catheterization[J].Am J Crit Care,1998,7:308-315.
[5]Chatterjee T.Do DD.Meier B,et al.Pseudoaneurysm offemoral artery after catheterisation:treatment by a mechanicalcompression device guided by colour Doppler ultrasound[J].Heart, 1998,79:502-506.
[6]O'sullivanGJ,Buckenham TM. The use of the Angio-Seal haemostatic puncture closure device in high risk patients[J]. Clin Radio, 1999,54:51-55.
[7]Silber S,Gershony G.A novel vascular sealing device for closure of percutaneous arterial access sites[J]. Am J Cardiol,1999,83:1248-1252.
[8]Duda SH. Suture-mediated percutaneous closure of antegrade femoral arterial access sites in patients who have received full anticoagulation therapy[J].Radiology,1999,210:47-52.
[9]姜东炬, Whittarer LS.经皮血管缝合器的临床应用[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2002,10:50-51.
[10] John F, Habibipour S. Surgical complications from hemostatic puncture closure devices[J].Am JSurg,1999,178:511-516.
[11]VaghettiSM.Effevtiveness and complications of vascular access closure devices after intervention alprocedures[J].J Invasive Cardiol,2000,12(8):395-399