我们的网站为什么显示成这样?

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式,您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本,以获取对此功能的支持,访问下面的网站,获取关于浏览器的信息:

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

不同人格类型对心脏电生理参数及心律失常发生的影响(PDF)

《心脏杂志》[ISSN:1009-7236/CN:61-1268/R]

期数:
2008年第3期
页码:
327-330
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2008-05-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of personality types on cardiac electrophysiological parameters and arrhythmias
作者:
郭红阳王玉堂单兆亮时向民刘建国
中国人民解放军总医院心内科,北京 100853
Author(s):
GUO Hongyang WANG Yutang SHAN Zhaoliang SHI Xiangmin LIU Jianguo
Department of Cardiology, PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
关键词:
电生理学人格心律失常有效不应期心率变异性QT离散度
Keywords:
electrophysiology personality arrhythmia effective refractory period heart rate variability QT dispersion
分类号:
R541.7
DOI:
-
文献标识码:
A
摘要:
目的 研究不同人格类型对心脏电生理参数及心律失常发生的影响。方法 以Eysenck人格问卷(EPQ)对97例行射频消融术的阵发性室上性心动过速患者进行人格测试,区分为内向稳定、内向不稳定、外向稳定和外向不稳定4种人格类型。采用同步12导联ECG、24小时Holter以及心脏内程序刺激测量QT离散度(QTd)、心率变异性(HRV)、不同部位心肌有效不应期(ERP)、AH和HV间期等心脏电生理指标并评价心律失常发生情况。结果 与稳定型人格者相比,不稳定型人格者心脏电生理参数改变为: ①ERP及AH间期缩短,ERPRA:(1921±275)ms vs (2113±280)ms,ERPRV:(1964±309)ms vs (2209±378)ms,ERPCS34:(1937±270)ms vs (2173±302)ms;AH:(964±156)ms vs (1116±155)ms,均P<001; ②QTd增加,(632±61)ms vs (579±67)ms,P<001; ③HRV时域分析指标中SDNN、HRV三角指数和RMSSD均明显下降,(1153±178)ms vs (1379±216)ms、(421±55)ms vs (489±62)ms、(244±36)ms vs (309±49)ms,均P<001;SDANN显著增高,(1254±189)ms vs (1023±151)ms,P<001; ④房性、交界性和室性早搏明显增多,(59±14)个/h vs (45±11)个/h、(39±09)个/h vs (31±07)个/h、(23±07)个/h vs (17±05)个/h,均P<001。结论 人格类型的不同可通过影响自主神经功能状态导致心脏电生理参数的差异,从而产生不同的心律失常易感性。
Abstract:
AIM To investigate the effects of personality types on cardiac electrophysiological parameters and arrhythmias. METHODS According to adult Eysenck personality questionnaire (EPQ), 97 patients, treated by radiofrequency ablation therapy because of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, were divided into 4 personality types: introversion and stabilization, introversion and instability, extroversion and stabilization, extroversion and instability. QT dispersion (QTd), heart rate variability (HRV), myocardial effective refractory period (ERP), AH and HV interval and arrhythmias were measured and analyzed by 12 leads ECG, 24 hours Holter and intracardiac programmable stimulation. RESULTS Compared with the patients with stable personality, the patients with unstable personality had shortened ERP and AH interval(P<001), increased QTd(P<001) and SDANN(P<001), and decreased SDNN and HRV triangular index and RMSSD(P<001). The atrial, junctonal and ventricular premature beats of the patients with unstable personality also increased(P<001). CONCLUSION Different personality types may accompany different autonomic nervous function, which subsequently results in changed cardiac electrophysiological parameters and various susceptibility to arrhythmias.

参考文献/References

[1] Hemingway H, Malik M, Marmot M. Social and psychosocial influences on sudden cardiac death, ventricular arrhythmia and cardiac autonomic function[J]. Eur Heart J, 2001, 22(13):1082-1101.

[2] Mattioli AV, Bonatti S, Zennaro M, et al. The relationship between personality, socioeconomic factors, acute life stress and the development, spontaneous conversion and recurrences of acute lone atrial fibrillation[J]. Europace, 2005, 7(3):211-220.

[3] Pedersen SS, van Domburg RT, Theuns DA, et al. Type D personality is associated with increased anxiety and depressive symptoms in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator and their partners[J]. Psychosom Med, 2004, 66(5):714-719.

[4] Cloninger CR. Biology of personality dimensions[J]. Curr Opin Psychiatry, 2000, 13(6):611-616.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2007-08-21.基金项目:全军“十一五”科技攻关课题资助(06G104) 通讯作者:王玉堂,主任医师,教授,主要从事心脏电生理、心律失常临床和基础研究Email:wangyt@301hospital.com.cn 作者简介:郭红阳,主治医师,博士Email:hfdxyxy@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: