我们的网站为什么显示成这样?

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式,您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本,以获取对此功能的支持,访问下面的网站,获取关于浏览器的信息:

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

直立倾斜试验阳性患者晕厥类型及其相关因素(PDF)

《心脏杂志》[ISSN:1009-7236/CN:61-1268/R]

期数:
2008年第3期
页码:
344-347
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2008-05-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Syncope types and correlated factors of patients with positive response in heatup tilt testing
作者:
冯旭光孟素荣王蔚谢昌联周国忠陈溢琳
南方医科大学附属南方医院心内科,广东 广州 510515
Author(s):
FENG Xuguang MENG Surong WANG Wei XIE Changlian ZHOU Guozhong CHEN Yilin
Department of Cardiology, Nanfang Hospital, Nanfang University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong, China
关键词:
晕厥直立倾斜试验血管迷走神经性晕厥硝酸甘油
Keywords:
syncope heatup tilt testing vasovagal syncope trinitroglycerin
分类号:
R364.134
DOI:
-
文献标识码:
A
摘要:
目的 分析直立倾斜试验阳性患者晕厥类型及相关因素。 方法 对151例接受住院治疗的不明原因晕厥患者行基础直立倾斜试验及硝酸甘油诱发试验,观察倾斜试验过程中临床表现与血流动力学变化并进行相关性分析。结果 阳性反应80例(529%),其中基础倾斜试验阳性 14例(175%),硝酸甘油激发 66例(825%);1型(混合型)45例(562%),2A型(心脏抑制不伴有心脏停搏)18例(225%),2B型(心脏抑制伴有心脏停搏)5例(60%)。3型(单纯血管减压)8例(10%),另外,根据血流动力学变化特点分为3组,分别是典型、不典型血管迷走神经性晕厥、直立不能耐受。其中典型阳性34例、占总阳性的425%,不典型46 例(575%),直立不能耐受组13 例,3组在年龄上有显著差异(P<001)。典型血管迷走神经性晕厥患者病史较长(平均10年),自主神经反应不良6年,直立不能耐受1年,3组在晕厥病史上有显著性差异(P<001)。结论 倾斜试验中年轻患者多为典型的血管迷走性晕厥,较易诱发。
Abstract:
AIM To summarize syncope types of the patients with positive response in tilt table test and to analyze the correlated factors. METHODS One hundred and fiftyone hospitalized patients with unexplained syncope were examined using a twostage tilt protocol with trinitroglycerin (TNG) provocation. Clinical symptoms and correlation were explored. RESULTS Eighty of the 151(529%) subjects displayed positive response in heatup tilt testing, 14(175%)were defined as positive during baseline headup tilt table test (BHUT) and 66(825%)were defined as positive during tilt protocol with trinitroglycerin (TNG) provocation. Fortyfive cases (562%) displayed typeⅠ, 18 cases (225%) displayed type 2A of mixed vasovagal response without cardiac arrest, 5 cases (60%) displayed type 2B of mixed vasovagal response with cardiac arrest, and 8 cases (10%) displayed type 3 of simplevascular decompression. According to hemodynamic features, all the subjects were divided into 3 groups namely the typical vasovagal syncope, dysautonomic neuropathy and orthostatic tolerance. Among them 34 cases (425%) were typical vasovagal syncope with positive response, 46 cases (575%) dysautonomic neuropathy and 13 cases orthostatic tolerance, with significant age difference among the 3 groups(P<001). The case history of typical vasovagal syncope patients averaged ten years and that of autonomic neuropathy adverse reaction group was six years, while that of vertical tolerance group was less than one year, with significant difference among the three groups (P<001). CONCLUSION Young people tend to display typical vasovagal syncope in tilt table test, which is easy to be induced. The pathogenesis remains to be explored.

参考文献/References

[1] Calkins H, Zipes DP. Hypotension and syncope[M]//Braunwald E. Heart diease. 7 th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders, 2004:909-919.

[2] Brignole M, Alboni P, Benditt DG, et al. Guidelines on management (diagnosis and treatment) of syncopeupdate 2004. Executive summary[J]. Eur Heart J, 2004, 25(11):2054-2972.

[3] Benditt DG, Ferguson DW, Grubb BP, et al. Tilt table testing for assessing syncope. American College of Cardiology[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1996, 28(1):263-275.

[4] Sutton R, Peterson M, Brignole M, et al. Proposed classification for tilt induced vasovagal syncope[J]. Eur J Cardia Pacing Electtrophysiol, 1992, 3(1):180-183.

[5] Mathias CJ, Deguchi K, Schatz I. Observations on recurrent syncope and presyncope in 641 patients[J]. Lancet, 2001, 357(9253):348-353.

[6] Soteriades ES, Evans JC, Larson MG, et al. Incidence and prognosis of syncope[J]. N Engl J Med, 2002, 347(12):878-885.

[7] Fenton AM, Hammill SC, Rea RF, et al. Vasovagal syncope[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2000, 133(9):714-725.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2007-07-05.通讯作者:孟素荣,教授,主要从事心脏起搏电生理研究Email:mengsur2007@163.com 作者简介:冯旭光,硕士生Email:fengxug2008@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: