我们的网站为什么显示成这样?

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式,您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本,以获取对此功能的支持,访问下面的网站,获取关于浏览器的信息:

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死直接PCI并发MACCE及大出血事件的相关因素(PDF)

《心脏杂志》[ISSN:1009-7236/CN:61-1268/R]

期数:
2012年第2期
页码:
200-204
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2012-04-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Correlation factors for major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events or hemorrhage in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction after primary percutaneous coronary intervention
作者:
邴 森14李成祥1郭文怡1李红梅2高 延2周 宁3
(1.第四军医大学西京医院心内科,陕西 西安 710032;2.解放军323医院心内科,陕西 西安 7100543; 3.武警陕西总队医院心血管内科,陕西 西安 710054;4.西安市第二医院心内科,陕西 西安 710003)
Author(s):
BING Sen14 LI Cheng-xiang1 GUO Wen-yi1 LI Hong-mei2 GAO Yan2 ZHOU Ning3
(1.Department of Cardiology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an 710032, Shaanxi, China; 2.Department of Cardiology, PLA 323 Hospital, Xi’an 710054, Shaanxi, China; 3.Department of Cardiology, Hospital of Shaanxi Provincial Corps of Chinese People’s Armed Police Forces, Xi’an 710054, Shaanxi, China; 4.Department of Cardiology, Second Hospital of Xi’an 710003, Shaanxi, China)
关键词:
心肌梗死急性ST段抬高型经皮冠状动脉介入主要不良心脑血管事件大出血相关因素
Keywords:
myocardial infaction acute ST-elevation percutaneous coronary intervention major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events hemorrhage correlation factors
分类号:
R541.4
DOI:
-
文献标识码:
A
摘要:
目的:回顾性分析急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者住院行直接冠状动脉介入治疗术(PCI)后发生主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)及大出血的相关因素。方法:以2008年9月~2010年8月收住的235例STEMI在12 h内行直接PCI术的患者为研究对象,分为病例组(包括MACCE及大出血)和对照组。搜集手术、药物、实验室等相关因素,包括急性梗死相关血管、术中有无慢血流和无再流发生及处理、处理前后血流分级、急性梗死相关血管球囊预扩张及支架扩张最高压力等数据,同时搜集左室射血分值、血小板计数、嗜酸性粒细胞计数、嗜碱性粒细胞计数、凝血系列、肝肾功、血脂4项、空腹血糖及心肌标志物等检测指标。采用多因素Logistic回归的方法分析上述因素与MACCE及大出血的相关性。结果:单因素分析显示病例组在急性IRA行直接支架植入术的比率、凝血酶原时间、CK方面高于对照组(P<0.05),在年龄、急性IRA慢血流及无再流的发生率、术前术中IABP的使用率、Killip分级、并发CTO的血管数量、急性IRA预扩最高压力、FPG、Cr、CK-MB方面显著高于对照组(P<0.01);而病例组在冠脉内替罗非班使用率、行2次PCI的比率、急性IRA支架的最高压力方面低于对照组(P<0.05),在男性患者的比率、慢血流及无再流处理前和处理后TIMI分级、植入支架的总数量、UA、TC、LDL-C、HDL-C、左室射血分数值(LVEF)方面显著低于对照组(P<0.01)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示年龄、冠脉内注射替罗非班、LVEF值与MACCE及大出血具有相关性(P<0.05),慢血流及无再流处理后TIMI分级与MACCE及大出血具有显著相关性(P<0.01)、其中年龄呈正相关,冠脉内注射替罗非班、慢血流及无再流处理后TIMI分级及左室射血分值呈负相关。结论:高龄、慢血流及无再流处理后TIMI分级小和LVEF值低是MACCE及大出血的危险因素;冠脉内注射替罗非班是保护因素。
Abstract:
AIM:To analyze correlation factors for major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) or hemorrhage in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-five cases of patients with STEMI in our department from September, 2008 to August 2010 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients with STEMI after PCI were divided into two groups: MACCE-hemorrhage group and non-MACCE or hemorrhage group, and the relationship between factors and MACCE-hemorrhage were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Patients in the MACCE-hemorrhage group had a higher proportion of direct stenting techniques and occurrence of slow or no-reflow and using intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), number of all vessels with chronic total occlusion (CTO), maximum pre-expansion pressure, PT, CK, and age than in the non-MACCE or hemorrhage group (P<0.05 and P<0.01). However, patients in the MACCE-hemorrhage group had a lower proportion of tirofiban use, male patients, maximum pressure of stent expansion, TIMI class after slow or no-reflow treatment, number of all stents implanted, UA, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C, and LVEF than in the non-MACCE or hemorrhage group (P<0.05 and P<0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age, intracoronary use of tirofiban, and LVEF were correlative factors for MACCE-hemorrhage (P<0.05), and TIMI class after slow or no-reflow treatment was evidently a correlative factor for MACCE-hemorrhage (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: Older age, lower TIMI class after slow or no-reflow treatment and low LVEF are risk factors for MACCE-hemorrhage. Intracoronary use of tirofiban is a protective factor for MACCE-hemorrhage.

参考文献/References

[1]胡大一,高润霖,葛均波,等.心血管疾病防治指南和共识2010[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2010:20-21.

[2]金彦彦,马长生.不同年龄段急性冠状动脉综合征患者的危险因素、冠状动脉病变特点及预后分析[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2009,17(1):28-31.

[3]Grobbee DE.Statin treatment and progression of atherosclerotic plaque burden[J].Drugs,2003,63(9):893-911.

[4]Rosenson RS.Statins in atherosclerosis:lipid-lowering agents with antioxidant capabilities[J].Atherosclerosis,2004, 173(1):1-12.

[5]康俊萍,马长生.非ST段抬高和ST段抬高心肌梗死患者介入结果的比较[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2010,20(19):11-25.

[6]胡大一,高润霖,葛均波,等.心血管疾病防治指南和共识2011[M].北京: 人民卫生出版社,2011:177-178.

[7]Morishi I,Sone T,Okumura K,et al.Agiographic no reflow phenomenon as a predictor of adverse long term outcome in patients treated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for first acute myocardial infarction[J].JACC,2000,36(6):1202-1209.

[8]Tanaka A,Kawarahayashi T,Nishibori Y,et al.No reflow phenomenon and lesion morphology in patiens with acute myocardial infarction[J].Ciuculation,2001,105(6):2148-2152.

[9]陈纪林.冠心病介入治疗并发症的防治[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2010:44-53.

[10]Gurm H,Tamhane U, Meier P,et al.A comparison of abciximab and small-molecule glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of contemporary randomized controlled trials[J].Ciuculation,2009,2(3):230-236.

[11]Gibson CM,Cannon CP, Murphy SA,et al.Relationship of TIMI myocardial perfusion grade to mortality after administration of thrombolytic drugs[J].Circulation,2000,101(2):125-130.

[12]陈纪林.冠心病介入治疗并发症的防治[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2010:96-98.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2011-11-02.通讯作者:李成祥,副教授,主要从事冠状动脉介入手术的研究Email:lichengxiang.2007@yahoo.com.cn 作者简介:邴森,主治医师,硕士生 Email:bsdn008@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2012-04-01