我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

人大隐静脉与胸廓内动脉平滑肌细胞生长特性的比较

《心脏杂志》[ISSN:1009-7236/CN:61-1268/R]

期数:
2014年第5期
页码:
524-528
栏目:
基础研究
出版日期:
2014-05-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of growth characteristics of smooth muscle cells from saphenous vein and internal thoracic artery in in vitro culture
作者:
朱天翔1; 蓝 斌1; 李锐雄1; 孟令英2; 许丽艳3; 李恩民4
(中山大学附属汕头医院、汕头市中心医院：1.心脏外科，2.心血管病研究所，广东 汕头 515031；
汕头大学医学院：3.分子免疫病理重点实验室，4.生物化学与分子生物学教研室，广东 汕头 515041)
Author(s):
ZHU Tian-xiang1;  LAN Bin1;  LI Rui-xiong1;  MENG Ling-ying2;  XU Li-yan3;  LI En-min4
(1.Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, 2.Cardiovascular Institute, Affiliated Shantou Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shantou 515031, Guangdong, China;
3.Department of Pathology & Key Immunopathology Laboratory of Guangdong Province, 4.Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical College of Shantou University, Shantou 515041, Guangdong, China)
关键词:
血管平滑肌细胞; 大隐静脉; 胸廓内动脉; 细胞培养; 生长特性
Keywords:
vascular smooth muscle cell;  saphenous vein;  internal thoracic artery;  cell culture;  growth characteristics
分类号:
R329.2
DOI:
-
文献标识码:
A
摘要:
目的:探讨人大隐静脉(saphenous vein,SV)与胸廓内动脉(internal thoracic artery,ITA)血管平滑肌细胞(VSMCs)的原代培养及传代培养的方法，并比较二者的生长特性。方法： 取冠状动脉搭桥术后剩余的SV与ITA血管标本，分为SV组与ITA组，用植块法进行VSMCs的原代培养，用免疫荧光染色法鉴定细胞，并比较两组细胞培养时间的差异。去血清培养48 h后，在DMEM/F12、100 ml/L FBS及10 ng/ml血小板源性生长因子(PDGF)-BB不同培养条件下，观察SV的VSMCs与ITA的VSMCs生长情况。用MTT比色法检测细胞增殖并进行比较。结果： 原代及传代培养均获成功。免疫荧光染色法显示平滑肌肌动蛋白(SMα-actin)位于细胞质，总阳性率>95%。SV组原代培养植块周围细胞爬出时间为(9.1±1.1) d，大于ITA组的(5.8±1.0) d(P<0.05)。 SV的VSMCs再次传代培养时间为(34.9±3.4) d大于ITA的VSMCs首次传代培养时间(29.1±4.4) d(P<0.05)。SV的VSMCs再次传代培养时间为(9.0±4.2) d，与ITA的VSMCs再次传代培养时间(9.6±3.9) d相似。两组细胞在相同培养条件时，未见明显的形态学差异，细胞生长曲线的差异无统计学意义。结论： 采用植块法进行SV与ITA的VSMCs原代培养简便可行，细胞纯度高，具有良好的细胞表型转变特性，是研究冠状动脉搭桥术后血管桥再狭窄分子机制良好的细胞模型。SV的VSMCs可能较ITA的VSMCs具有更强的增殖潜能，二者内在属性的差异仍有待于进一步研究。
Abstract:
AIM:To explore primary culture and subculture methods of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) from human saphenous vein (SV) and internal thoracic artery (ITA) and to compare their growth characteristics in vitro. METHODS: SV and ITA tissues were obtained from patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. VSMCs were primarily cultured by explant attached method and then were identified by immunofluorescence staining. Cell culture time of SV VSMCs and ITA VSMCs were compared and analyzed. After 48 h serum deprived culture, SV VSMC and ITA VSMC growth was observed under different conditions of DMEM/F12, 10% FBS and 10 ng/ml PDGF-BB and cell proliferations were compared by MTT assay. RESULTS: The primary and subculture were successfully completed. Positive staining of SMα-actin in the cytoplasm was shown by immunofluorescence (positive rate of >95%). Primary cultured VSMC growth from the edge of SV tissue clumps after incubation was slower than that of ITA ［(9.1±1.1) vs.(5.8±1.0) days, P<0.05］. The first passage time of SV VSMCs (34.9±3.4) days was longer than that of ITA VSMCs (29.1±4.4) days, P<0.05 and the re-passage time of SV VSMCs (9.0±4.2) days was similar to that of ITA VSMCs (9.6±3.9) days. No significant morphological difference was observed between SV VSMCs and ITA VSMCs under the same culture conditions and no significant difference was found in the relative cell growth curves. CONCLUSION: VSMC primary culture of SV and ITA by explant attached method is feasible. VSMCs in vivo present good cell phenotype transformation characteristics and can be used as a good cell model for molecular mechanism study of restenosis after coronary artery bypass surgery. SV VSMCs may have stronger proliferation potentials than ITA VSMCs. The intrinsic difference of VSMCs from SV and ITA still needs further study.

参考文献/References

[1]Cameron A,Davis KB,Green G,et al.Coronary bypass surgery with internal thoracic-artery grafts:effects on survival over a 15-year period[J].N Engl J Med,1996,334(4):216-219.
[2]Mitra AK,Gangahar DM,Agrawal DK.Cellular,molecular and immunological mechanisms in the pathophysiology of vein graft intimal hyperplasia[J]. Immunol Cell Biol,2006,84(2):115-124.
[3]Muto A,Fitzgerald TN,Pimiento JM.Smooth muscle cell signal transduction:implications of vascular biology for vascular surgeons[J].J Vasc Surg,2007,45(Suppl A):A15-A24.
[4]Frischknecht K,Greutert H,Weisshaupt C.Different vascular smooth muscle cell apoptosis in the human internal mammary artery and the saphenous vein.Implications for bypass graft disease[J].J Vasc Res,2006,43(4):338-346.
[5]Weiss S,Frischknecht K,Greutert H.Different migration of vascular smooth muscle cells from human coronary artery bypass vessels.Role of Rho/ROCK pathway[J].J Vasc Res,2007,44(2):149-156.
[6]Zhu TX,Lan B,Meng LY,et al.ECM-related gene expression profile in vascular smooth muscle cells from human saphenous vein and internal thoracic artery[J].J Cardiothorac Surg,2013,8:155.
[7]Hao H,Ropraz P,Verin V,et al.Heterogeneity of smooth muscle cell populations cultured from pig coronary artery[J].Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol,2002, 22(7):1093-1099.
[8]Majesky MW.Developmental basis of vascular smooth muscle diversity[J].Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol,2007,27(6):1248-1258.
[9]Owens GK,Kumar MS,Wamhoff BR.Molecular regulation of vascular smooth muscle cell differentiation in development and disease[J].Physiol Rev,2004,84(3):767-801.
[10]韩雅玲,肖艳平,齐岩梅,等.胚胎血管发育早期 PDGF-BB对血管平滑肌细胞趋化的影响[J].中国病理生理杂志,2008,24(2):251-256.
[11]高 蕊，董立华，肖 立，等.PDGF-BB对血管平滑肌细胞表型标志物表达的影响[J].中国病理生理杂志,2010,26(12):2301-2305.
[12]韩 梅，温进坤，郑 斌，等.血清饥饿可诱导人血管平滑肌细胞再分化[J].中国生物化学与分子生物学报, 2003,19(2):250-255.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2013-11-01.
基金项目：广东省自然科学基金项目资助（9151009101000021）
通讯作者：蓝斌，主任医师，主要从事冠心病外科治疗的基础与临床研究 Email：gdstlanbin@163.com
作者简介：朱天翔，主治医师，硕士 Email： xiang_tony@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2014-06-05