我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

右室间隔起搏与心尖部起搏对完全性房室传导阻滞患者心功能影响的比较

《心脏杂志》[ISSN:1009-7236/CN:61-1268/R]

期数:
2015年第3期
页码:
291-293
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2015-01-11

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of right ventricular septal pacing and right ventricular apical pacing on heart functions in patients with complete atrioventricular block: a comparative study
作者:
韩 凯; 张海成; 肖世南; 董卫锋; 鲁莉萍
(解放军第一医院心内科，甘肃 兰州 730030)
Author(s):
HAN Kai;  ZHANG Hai-cheng;  XIAO Shi-nan;  DONG Wei-feng;  LU Li-ping
(Department of Cardiology, PLA First Hospital, Lanzhou 730030, Gansu, China)
关键词:
右室间隔起搏; 右室心尖部起搏; 完全房室传导阻滞; 心功能
Keywords:
right ventricular septal pacing;  right ventricular apical pacing;  complete atrioventricular block;  cardiac function
分类号:
R541.7
DOI:
-
文献标识码:
A
摘要:
目的:初步探讨右室间隔起搏(RVSP)和右室心尖部起搏( RVAP)对完全房室传导阻滞( CAVB) 患者心功能的影响。方法:87例因CAVB植入起搏器的患者, 其中45例行RVSP术(RVSP组)，42例行RVAP术(RVAP组)，分别对术前及术后6、12和18个月，患者的QRS波时限、左室舒张末内径（LVEDD）、 左室射血分数（LVEF）、每搏量（SV）、心脏指数（CI）、加速度指数（ACI）进行检查比较。结果:所有患者均完成12个月随访, 79例完成18个月随访。术后RVAP组QRS波时限较RVSP组明显增宽(P<0.05)，术后12个月RVAP组LVEF、SV、ACI均较RVSP组明显降低(P<0.05)，术后18个月RVAP组LVEDD较RVSP组明显增大(P<0.05)，RVAP组CI均较RVSP组降低，但尚未达到显著性差异。结论:RVSP较RVAP有利于CAVB患者心功能的保护。
Abstract:
AIM:To compare the effects of right ventricular septal pacing (RVSP) and right ventricular apical pacing (RVAP) on heart functions in patients with complete atrioventricular block (CAVB). METHODS: Eighty-seven CAVB patients with implanted pacemakers were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into RVSP group (n=45) and RVAP group (n=42). QRS duration, LVEDD, LVEF, SV, CI and ACI were measured before implantation and 6, 12 and 18 months after implantation. RESULTS: QRS duration in RVAP group was longer than in RVSP group (P<0.05). LVEF, SV and ACI in RVAP group decreased compared with those in RVSP group 12 months after implantation (P<0.05). LVEDD in RVAP group increased compared with that in RVSP group 18 months after implantation (P<0.05). CI in RVAP group decreased, but no significant difference was found between groups 18 months after implantation. CONCLUSION: Right ventricular septal pacing (RVSP) is good in protecting cardiac function in patients with CAVB compared with right ventricular apical pacing (RVAP).

参考文献/References

[1]Thambo JB,Bordachar P,Garrigue S,et al.Detrimental ventricular remodeling in patients with congenital complete heart block and chronic right ventricular apical pacing[J].Circulation,2004,110(25):3766-3772.
[2]王方正,姚 焰.多部位心脏起搏[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志,1999,13(2):4-6.
[3]Manolis AS. The deleterious Consequences of right ventricular apical pacing: time to seek alternate site pacing[J].Pacing Clin Electrophysiol,2006,29(3):298-315.
[4]任学军,张 烨,韩智红,等.右室心尖部起搏对左室电机械活动的影响[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志,2008,22(6):496-498.
[5]Hillock RJ,Stevenson IH,Mond HG.The right ventricular outflow tract:a comparative study of septal, anterior wall,and free wall pacing[J].Pacing Clin Electrophysiol,2007,30(8):942-947.
[6]洪鹭蓉,吴少平,黄小洪,等.DDD起搏器选择心室起搏部位对血流动力学的影响[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志,2007,21(6):508-510.
[7]史浩颖,汪 芳,孟伟栋,等.组织多普勒评价右室不同部位起搏对左室收缩功能和同步性的影响[J].中华心血管病杂志,2005,33(11):1002-1005.
[8]Cano O,Osca J,Sancho-Tello MJ,et al.Comparison of effectiveness of right ventricular septal pacing versus right ventricular apical pacing[J].Am J Cardiol,2010,105(10):1426-1432.
[9]Rosso R,Medi C,Teh AW,et al.Right ventricular septal pacing: a comparative study of outflow tract and mid ventricular sites[J].Pacing Clin Electrophysiol,2010,33(10):1169-1173.
[10]Yusu S,Mera H,Hoshida K,et al.Selective site pacing from the rightventricular mid-septum[J].Int Heart J,2012,53(2):113-116.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2014-08-19.
通讯作者：张海成，副主任医师，主要从事心血管疾病临床研究Email：13919272222@163.com
作者简介：韩凯，主治医师，硕士Email：kaikblue@sina.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-02-03