我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

心血管内科临床实习中不同教学模式教学效果的比较

《心脏杂志》[ISSN:1009-7236/CN:61-1268/R]

期数:
2016年第3期
页码:
374-F003
栏目:
医学教育
出版日期:
2016-01-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of the effect of different teaching models in clinical practice of cardiovascular internal medicine
作者:
朱淑金1; 高 岚2; 谢学建3; 邵丽杰3; 鱼 淼3; 宁莉莉3; 杨 晶3; 4
（解放军第323医院：1.老干部门诊部，2.门诊部，3.心血管内科，陕西 西安 710054；
4.西安医学院研究生院，陕西 西安 710021）
Author(s):
ZHU Shu-jin1;  GAO Lan2;  XIE Xue-jian3;  SHAO Li-jie3;  Yu Miao3;  NING Li-li3;  YANG Jing; 4
(1.Outpatient Department of Veteran Cadres, 2.Department of Outpatient, 3.Department of Cardiology, PLA 323 Hospital, Xi’an 710054, Shaanxi, China；
4.Graduate School, Xi’an Medical College, Xi’an 710021, Shaanxi, China)
关键词:
教学模式; 比较; 临床实习; 心血管病内科
Keywords:
teaching mode;  comparison;  clinical practice;  cardiovascular internal medicine
分类号:
R544
DOI:
-
文献标识码:
A
摘要:
目的比较以问题为基础的教学模式(PBL)、以案例为基础的教学模式(CBL)及PBL+CBL整合教学在心血管内科临床实习中的应用效果。方法选取在我院心血管内科参加临床实习的医学本科生61名，随机分为3组：PBL教学组（n=20人），CBL教学组（n=20人），和PBL+CBL教学组（n=21人）。通过考试成绩、相关能力考核以及学习情况调查评价教学模式的作用及意义。结果PBL+CBL组学生的考试成绩、相关能力考核以及学习情况调查显著优于PBL组和CBL组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。PBL组与 CBL组在考试成绩、相关能力考核以及学习情况调查等方面无统计学差异。结论PBL与 CBL结合的教学模式教学效果优于PBL和CBL教学模式。
Abstract:
AIM To compare the teaching effect among a model of problem-based learning (PBL), model of case-based learning (CBL), and model of integration of PBL+CBL in clinical practice of cardiovascular internal medicine. METHODSSixty-one students majoring in clinical medicine during their internship in the Department of Cardiology of our hospital were selected and randomly divided into three groups: PBL group (n=20), CBL group (n=20) and PBL+CBL group (n=21). The effect and the significance of different teaching models were evaluated by examination results, assessment of relevant ability and survey of study situation. RESULTSResults of examination, assessment of relevant ability and survey of study situation in PBL+CBL group were all significantly better than those in PBL group and CBL group (P<0.05). No statistical difference in examination results, assessment of relevant ability and survey of study situation was found between PBL group and CBL group. CONCLUSIONThe teaching effect of the integrated model of PBL+CBL is superior to that of the PBL mode and CBL mode.

参考文献/References

[1]Onyon C.Problem-based learning:a review of the educational and psychological theory[J].Clin Teach,2012,9(1):22-26.
[2]Srinivasan M,Wilkes M,Stevenson F,et al.Comparing problem based learning with case-based learning:effects of a major curricular shift at two institutions[J].Acad Med,2007,82(1):74-82.
[3]马 颖,李 妍,刘 敏，等.PBL与CBL整合教学模式在心内科临床教学中的应用[J].心脏杂志,2015,17(4):332-334.
[4]张黎军.多媒体联合PBL在神经病学临床实习教学中的应用[J].中国社区医师,2015,31(7):168-169.
[5]王玉英.七年制医学生PBL外语教学探索与实践[J].中国科技信息,2011,11(139):208-209.
[6]Van Berkel HJ,Dolmans DH.The influence of tutoring competencies on problems,group functioning and student achievement in problem-based learning[J].Med Educ,2006,40(8):730-736.
[7]Barrows HS, Tamblyn RM. Problem-Based Learning:An Approach to Medical Education[M].Springer Publishing Co Inc,1980.
[8]高 雪.基于问题的学习(PBL)在医学教育中的利与弊[J].医学教育, 2014,34(1):142-144.
[9]夏 颖,顾鸣敏.PBL教学法与CBL教学法的比较—基于两种教学法的转换在临床课程学习上的效果分析[J].复旦教育论坛,2009,7(5):88-91.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2015-10-29.
基金项目：兰州军区医药卫生科技攻关项目资助（CLZ13JB19）；解放军第323医院重大培育课题资助（2012323A02）
通讯作者：杨晶，副主任医师，主要从事心血管内科临床和基础研究 Email：yangjing323@163.com
作者简介：朱淑金，副主任医师 Email：786147854@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-01-07