我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

左右心室收缩功能对心脏再同步化治疗效果的预测价值

《心脏杂志》[ISSN:1009-7236/CN:61-1268/R]

期数:
2016年第5期
页码:
534-537
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2016-04-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Left and right ventricular longitudinal strains are predictors of reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy
作者:
吕文青; 智 光; 王 晶; 周 肖; 刘峻松
（解放军总医院心血管内科，北京 100853）
Author(s):
L? Wen-qing;  ZHI Guang;  WANG Jing;  ZHOU Xiao;  LIU Jun-song
(Department of Cardiology, PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China)
关键词:
心脏再同步化治疗; 心力衰竭; 超声心动图; 心肌; 应变
Keywords:
cardiac resynchronization therapy;  echocardiography;  heart failure;  myocardium;  strain
分类号:
R541.6
DOI:
-
文献标识码:
A
摘要:
目的 评价左右室收缩功能对心脏再同步化治疗（CRT）效果的预测价值。方法 选取2011年1月1日~2015年5月31日因心功能不全在解放军总医院植入CRT的患者50例。收集患者的临床资料测定术前和术后6个月的超声心动图指标，测定指标包括左室长轴应变(LVSLS)、右室长轴应变(RVSLS)等。按照CRT的超声反应标准进行分组，分为CRT治疗有反应组（n=31）和无反应组（n=19）,首先通过单因素分析和多因素分析，分析VVI参数与CRT治疗效果的相关性，在此基础上进一步通过受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析得出各参数指标ROC下的面积（AUC）和截断点，再分别计算各参数单独和联合预测CRT有效性的灵敏度、特异度和准确度。结果 ①LVSLS、RVSLS与CRT治疗效果有相关性，多因素Logistic回归模型分析，发现LVSLS〔OR 3.45 CI(2.47-10.86),P<0.01〕，RVSLS〔OR 3.01 CI(1.98-4.66),P<0.01〕。②VVI参数预测价值部分，LVSLS 的AUC为0.722（P<0.01），RVSLS的 AUC为0.703（P<0.01），串联试验后AUC最大，为0.798（P<0.01），选定的截断点分别为LVSLS>9.7%,RVSLS>16.8%。分别计算其灵敏度、特异度和准确度，LVSLS的上述指标分别是90%、42%和72%；RVSLS分别是87%、53%和74%；LVSLS和RVSLS串联试验分别是84%、68%和78%。结论 左右心室收缩功能与CRT治疗效果有相关性，串联左右心室长轴峰值应变指标预测CRT治疗效果优于单一指标。
Abstract:
AIM To identify the strain echocardiographic parameters for predicting LV reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). METHODSFifty consecutive patients with heart failure for implantation of a biventricular pacemaker were enrolled. Echocardiographic and clinical data were collected at baseline and 6 months after implantation, including left ventricular systolic longitudinal strain (LVSLS) and right ventricular systolic longitudinal strain (RVSLS). Patients were grouped according to echocardiographic response. Multivariable analysis was performed on significant parameters on the univariate analysis. Sensitivity and specificity of the best performing cutoff value for the parameters was determined using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. These echocardiographic parameters were combined to predict LV reverse remodeling after CRT. RESULTSBaseline echocardiographic indexes of left ventricular systolic longitudinal strain (LVSLS) and right ventricular systolic longitudinal strain (RVSLS) were significantly more impaired in nonresponders vs. responders to CRT (P<0.01). Multiple logistic analysis identified LVSLS ［OR 3.45 CI(2.47-10.86), P<0.01］, RVSLS ［OR 3.01 CI (1.98-4.66), P<0.0］ as the independent predictor of reverse remodeling after CRT. Cut-off values were defined as LVSLS>9.7% with 90% sensitivity, 42% specificity and 72% accuracy, (AUC=0.22, P<0.01) and RVSLS>16.8% with 87% sensitivity 53% specificity and 74% accuracy (AUC=0.703, P<0.01). Patients with baseline LVSLS>9.7% and RVSLS>16.8% were named both-responder. Others were named non-both-responder. Combined LVSLS and RVSLS predicted CRT response with 84% sensitivity, 68% specificity and 78% accuracy, which was significantly better than either technique alone (AUC=0.798, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONLeft and right ventricular systolic function are associated with LV reverse remodeling after CRT. The combined echocardiographic parameters of left and right ventricular longitudinal strain predict the outcomes more accurately than a single echocardiographic parameter.

参考文献/References

[1]Cleland JG,Daubert C,Erdmann E,et al.The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure[J].N Engl J Med,2005,352(15):1539-1549.
[2]Park JH,Negishi K,Grimm RA,et al.Echocardiographic predictors of reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy and subsequent events[J].Circ Cardiovasc Imaging,2013,6(6):864-872.
[3]Kyriacou A,Pabari PA,Francis DP.Cardiac resynchronization therapy is certainly cardiac therapy, but how much resynchronization and how much atrioventricular delay optimization?[J].Heart Fail Rev,2012,17(6): 727-736.
[4]Sade LE,?zin B,Atar I,et al.Right ventricular function is a determinant of long-term survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy[J].J Am Soc Echocardiogr,2013,26(7):706-713.
[5]Field ME,Gavazzi A,Campana C,et al.Right ventricular dysfunction and adverse outcome in patients with advanced heart failure[J].J Card Fail,2006,12(8): 616-620.
[6]Khatib M,Moss AJ,Hall WJ,et al.EAARN score,a predictive score for mortality in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy based on pre-implantation risk factors[J].Eur J Heart Fail,2014,16(7):802-809.
[7]McMurray JJ,Gavazzi A,Campana C,et al.ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2012 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association(HFA)of the ESC[J].Eur J Heart Fail,2012,14(8): 803-869.
[8]Cameli M,McElderry HT,Plumb VJ,et al.Speckle tracking echocardiography as a new technique to evaluate right ventricular function in patients with left ventricular assist device therapy[J].J Heart Lung Transplant,2013,32(4):424-430.
[9]Sengelov M,Lisi M,Righini FM,et al.Global Longitudinal Strain Is a Superior Predictor of All-Cause Mortality in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction[J].JACC Cardiovasc Imaging,2015,21(2): 223-236.
[10]Stanton T,Leano R,Marwick TH.Prediction of all-cause mortality from global longitudinal speckle strain: comparison with ejection fraction and wall motion scoring[J].Circ Cardiovasc Imaging,2009,2(5):356-364.
[11]Hasselberg NE,Banya W,Mohiaddin RH,et al.Left ventricular markers of mortality and ventricular arrhythmias in heart failure patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy[J].Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging,2015,4(3)348-355.
[12]Ghio S,Guha K,Sharma R,et al.Independent and additive prognostic value of right ventricular systolic function and pulmonary artery pressure in patients with chronic heart failure[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2001,37(1):183-188.
[13]Scuteri L,Moss AJ,Hall WJ,et al.Relevance of echocardiographic evaluation of right ventricular function in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy[J].Pacing Clin Electrophysiol,2009,32(8):1040-1049.
[14]Alpendurada F,Jorgensen PG,Jensen JS,et al.Right ventricular dysfunction is a predictor of non-response and clinical outcome following cardiac resynchronization therapy[J].J Cardiovasc Magn Reson,2011,13(1): 68.
[15]Tumminello G,Parkhomenko A,Pieske BM,et al.Exercise ventilation inefficiency in heart failure: pathophysiological and clinical significance[J].Eur Heart J, 2007,28(6):673-678.
[16]Rost C,Cameli M,Righini FM,et al.Relation of functional echocardiographic parameters to infarct scar transmurality by magnetic resonance imaging[J].J Am Soc Echocardiogr,2014,27(7):767-774.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2016-01-01.
通讯作者：智光，主任医师，主要从事心脏超声研究 Email：13910994856@163.com
作者简介：吕文青，硕士生 Email：13716282629@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-04-13