我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

远端保护装置在介入治疗中的应用进展(PDF)

《心脏杂志》[ISSN:1009-7236/CN:61-1268/R]

期数:
2005年第1期
页码:
74-76
栏目:
综述
出版日期:
2005-01-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
-
作者:
王海昌; 曹丰; 李成祥
第四军医大学西京医院心脏内科，陕西 西安 710032
Author(s):
-
关键词:
远端保护装置;  介入治疗;  冠状动脉 ; 心肌梗塞; 急性
Keywords:
-
分类号:
R542.22; R654.2
DOI:
-
文献标识码:
A
摘要:
对急性ST段抬高性心肌梗死闭塞血管采用球囊扩张和支架植入等急诊冠脉内介入治疗时，常常会引起血栓碎裂、脱落而阻塞远端小血管及毛细血管，导致远端血流缓慢，发生病变血管再通后血流缓慢，甚至发生“无复流现象”。远端保护装置可安全、有效地用于急性心肌梗死等血管内存在大量血栓时的介入治疗,具有良好的应用前景。作者对近年来远端保护装置在介入治疗中的应用进展情况作一综述。
Abstract:
-

参考文献/References

［1］ Morishima I,Sone T, Okumura K, et al. Agiographic no reflow phenomenon as a predictor of adverse long term outcome in patients treated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for first acute myocardial infarction［J］. JACC, 2000,36:1202-1209.

［2］Tanaka A, Kawarabayashi T, Nishibori Y, et al. No reflow phenomenon and lesion morphology in patients with acute myocardial infarction［J］. Circulation, 2002, 105:2148-2152.

［3］Grube E, Amann FW, Klugmann S. GuardWire Plus远端保护下急性心肌梗死的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗［J］, 中国介入心脏病学杂志，2003,11(4):224.

［4］Topol EJ, Yadav JS. Recognition of the importance of embolization in atherosclerotic vascular disease［J］. Circu lation,2000,101:570-580.

［5］Mehta RH, Harjai KJ, Boura J, et al. Prognostic significance of transient noreflow during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation acute myocardial infarction［J］. Am J Cardiol, 2003,92:1445-1447.

［6］EPISTENT Investigators. Randomized placebocontrolled and balloonangioplasty controlled trial to assess safety of coronary stenting with use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade［J］. Lancet, 1998, 352:87-92.

［7］Carlino M, De Gregorio J, Di Mario C, et al. Prevention of distal embolization during saphenous vein graft lesion angioplasty［J］. Circulation, 1999,99: 3221-3223.

［8］Grube E, Gerckens U, Yeung AC, et al. Prevention of distal embolization during coronary angioplasty in saphenous vein grafts and native vessels using porous filter protection［J］. Circulation, 2001,104:2436-2441.

［9］Grube E, Schofer J, Webb J, et al. Evaluation of a balloon occlusion and aspiration system for protection from distal embolization during stenting in saphenous vein grafts［J］. Am J Cardiol, 2002,89: 941-945.

［10］SAFER Trial Investigators, Baim D, Wahr D, et al. Randomized trial of a distal embolic protection device during percutaneous intervention of saphenous vein aortocoronary bypass grafts［J］. Circulation, 2002,105:r13-r18.

［11］Grube E, Schofer JJ，Webb J，et al. Evaluation of a balloon occlusion and aspiration system for protection from distal embolization during stenting in saphenous vein grafts［J］. Am J Cardiol, 2002，89:941-945.

［12］Rogers C, Huynh R, Seifert PA, et al. Embolic protection with filtering or occlusion balloons during saphenous vein graft stenting retrieves identical volumes and sizes of particulate debris［J］. Circulation, 2004,109(14):1735-1740.

［13］Yip HK, Chen MC, Chang HW, et al. Transradial application of PercuSurge GuardWire device during primary percutaneous intervention of infarctrelated artery with highburden thrombus formation［J］. Catheter Cardiovas Interv,2004,61(4):503-511.

［14］Henry M, Amor M, Henry I, et al. Protected renal artery angioplasty and stenting: a new concept of treatment. First preliminary report with PercuSurge GuardWire (abstract)［J］. Am J Cardiol, 1999, 84:19P.

［15］Grube E, Gerckens R, Muller R, et al. The SAFE study: multicenter evaluation of a protection catheter system for distal embolization in coronary venous bypass grafts (SVGs) (abstract)［J］. Am J Cardiol, 1999,84:19P.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2004-07-12.
更新日期/Last Update: 2010-01-05