我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

经皮冠状动脉介入术后应用血管闭合器与人工压迫止血效果比较(PDF)

《心脏杂志》[ISSN:1009-7236/CN:61-1268/R]

期数:
2005年第5期
页码:
461-463
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2005-10-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
A compartive study on the hemostatic effects by using AngioSealer versus mechanical compression in patients with coronary artery diseases following percutaneous coronary interventions
作者:
拓步雄1; 2; 李慧1; 2; 栾荣华1; 王海昌1; 郭文怡1; 李成祥1; 李伟杰1; 秦涛1
1.第四军医大学西京医院心内科， 陕西 西安 710032; 2. 解放军451医院心内科, 陕西 西安 710054
Author(s):
TUO Buxiong1; 2;  LI Hui1; 2;  LUAN Ronghua1;  WANG Haichang1;  GUO Wenyi1;  LI Chengxiang1; LI Weijie1;  QING Tao1
1.Department of Cardiology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi′an, Shaanxi 710032; 2.Department of Cardiology,451 Hospital of PLA,Xi′an,Shaanxn 710054,China
关键词:
冠状动脉; 介入治疗; 止血技术
Keywords:
coronary artery;  interventional therapy;  hemostasis technique
分类号:
R541.1
DOI:
-
文献标识码:
A
摘要:
目的 对比冠状动脉造影术（CAG）与冠脉介入治疗（PCI）术后，应用经皮血管闭合器（AngioSealTM）与人工压迫止血对患者止血时间、制动时间及并发症的发生率，评价AngioSealTM止血疗效及安全性，并对其操作要点进行归纳总结。方法 将接受CAG与PCI术的患者277例，分为AngioSealTM组（107例）与人工压迫止血组（170例），观察两组患者止血时间、卧床及制动时间、并发症的发生率。结果 AngioSealTM止血组与人工压迫止血组相比，止血时间、卧床及制动时间显著缩短，血管并发症明显降低。应用AngioSealTM止血成功率97%。结论 AngioSealTM止血明显优于人工压迫止血。
Abstract:
AIM To compare the effects of percutaneous angioSealer and thosr of hemostasis by compression in patients with coronary artery diseases following coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary interventional (PCI), and to evaluate the efficiency and safety of percutaneous angioSealer method. METHODS In 277 patients undergoing CAG and PCI operation, angioSealer was applied to 107 patients and the rest received conventional hemostasis by compression. The patients' hemostasistime, bed rest time, incidence of complications in the surrounding blood vessels were compared between two groups. RESULTS Compared with hemostasis by compression group, the patients' hemostasis time, bedlying duration and complication incidence rate were significantly decreased in angioSealer group. The successful hemostasis rate in angioSealer group was 97%. CONCLUSION Application of angioSealer following CAG and PCI operation significantly decreases hemostasis time, bedrest time and incidence of complications.

参考文献/References

［1］ 惠海鹏，许顶立，侯玉清，等. 冠状动脉造影术后并发急性肺栓塞和右股深静脉血栓各1例 ［J］. 临床心血管病杂志，2000，16：202.

［2］ Popma JJ, Satler LF, Dilchard AD,et al. Vascular complication after balloon and new device angioplasty［J］. Circulation，1993，88：1569-1578.

［3］ Muller DM, Shamir KJ, Ellis SG,et al. Peripheral vascular complications after conventional and complex percutaneous transluminal angioplasty ［J］. Am J Cardiol，1992，69：63-68.

［4］ Gerckene U, Cattelaens N, Lampe EG,et al. Management of arterial puncture site after catheterization procedures: evaluating a suture-mediated closure device ［J］. Am J Cardiol，1999，83（12）：1658-1663.

［5］ Tsetis DK, Kochiadakis GE, Hatzidakis AA,et al. Transcatheter thrombolysis with highdose bolus tissue plasminogen activator in iatrogenic arterial occlusion after femoral arterial catheterization ［J］. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol，2002，25：36-41.

［6］ Shammas NW, Rajendran VR, Alidredge, SG,et al. Randomized comparison of VasoSeal and AngioSeal closure devices in patients undergoing coronary angiography and angioplasty ［J］. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2002,55:421-425.

［7］Assaili AR, Sdringola S, Moustapha A,et al. Outcome of access site in patients treated with platelet glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa inhibitors in the era of closure devices ［J］. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2003,58:1-5.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2005-01-18.
更新日期/Last Update: 2010-01-05