我们的网站为什么显示成这样?

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式,您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本,以获取对此功能的支持,访问下面的网站,获取关于浏览器的信息:

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

急性心肌梗死后择期冠脉介入治疗对左室重构和心功能的影响(PDF)

《心脏杂志》[ISSN:1009-7236/CN:61-1268/R]

期数:
2008年第1期
页码:
74-76
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2008-01-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of delayed percutaneous coronary interventions on left ventricular remodeling and cardiac function after acute myocardial infarction
作者:
刘积伦1雷丽君2武胜1
1.陕西省核工业二一五医院心内科,陕西 咸阳 712000;2.陕西省西北机器厂医院心内科,陕西 宝鸡 722400
Author(s):
LIU Jilun1LEI Lijun2WU Sheng1
1.Depatment of Cardiology, Shaanxi Province Nuclear Industry 215 Hospital,Xianyang 712000,Shaanxi,China;2.Depatment of Cardiology, Shaanxi Province Northwest Machine Factory Hospital,Baoji 722400,Shaanxi,China
关键词:
心肌梗死急性冠脉介入治疗择期左室重构心功能
Keywords:
myocardial infarction acutepercutaneous coronary interventionsdelayedleft ventricular remodelingcardiac function
分类号:
R541.4
DOI:
-
文献标识码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨急性心肌梗死(AMI)后择期经皮冠状动脉介入(PCI)治疗对左心室重构和心功能的影响。方法 112例AMI患者,分为PCI组和药物治疗组,PCI组于发病后1~2周内行PCI治疗,所有患者于发病后1~2周时、4周和24周时行超声心动图(UCG)检查,观察左心室收缩末容积指数(LVESVI)、左心室舒张末容积指数(LVEDVI)和左室射血分数(LVEF)。结果 行PCI治疗后,血管再通率为100%,术后4周和24周的LVESVI、LVEDVI和LVEF均明显优于术前,与药物治疗组比较有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论 AMI后择期PCI治疗能够有效抑制左心室重构,改善心功能。
Abstract:
AIM To study the effects of delayed percutaneous coronary interventions(PCI) on left ventricular remodeling and cardiac function after acute myocardial infarction(AMI).METHODS The 112 cases with acute myocardial infarction were treated with medicine and with delayed PCI one or two weeks after infarction.The echocardiography was applied to observe the alternation of left ventricular endsystolic volume index(LVESVI),left ventricular enddiastolic volume index(LVEDVI) and left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF) with the total cases during two weeks and four weeks and twentyfour weeks. RESULTS In patients treated with PCI,reperfusion rate were 100%.The improvements of LVESVI and LVEDVI and LVEF were significant after PCI,patients who underwent PCI had lower mortality rate than those who were treated with medicine(P<0.05).CONCLUSION Delayed PCI can still inhibits left ventricular remodeling and improve cardiac function.

参考文献/References

[1] Keeley EC,Boura JA,Grines CL.Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction:a quantitative review of 23 randomized trials [J].Lancet,2003,361(9351):13-20.

[2] Bertrand ME,McFadden EP.Late is perhaps not…too late for primary PCI in acute myocardial infarction[J].Eur Heart J,2002,23(15):1146-1148.

[3] 中华医学会心血管病学分会,中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会,中国循环杂志编辑委员会.急性心肌梗死诊断和治疗指南[J].中华心血管病杂志,2001,29(12):710-725.

[4] 王远鹤,齐国先.急性心肌梗死的择期介入治疗[J].国外医学·心血管疾病分册,2005,32(3):149-151.

[5] 吕蓓,路国平,沈卫峰.延迟经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性心肌梗死的疗效观察[J].临床心血管病杂志,2003,19(10):579-580.

[6] 李国华,姚玉才,王晓军,等.静脉溶栓后选择性PCI对急性心肌梗死患者远期预后的影响[J].山东医药,2005,45(28):5-6.

[7] Alter DA,Tu JV,Austin PC.Waiting times revascularization modality and outcomes after acute myocardial infarction at hospitals with and without onsite revascularization facilities in Canada[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2003,42(2):410-419.

[8] Stenestrand U,Wallentin L.Early revascularization and 1year survival in 14day survivors of acute myocardial infarction:a prospective cohort study[J].Lancet,2002,359(9320):1805-1811.

[9] 郭文怡,贾国良,李伟杰,等.心肌梗死455例PCI后临床疗效观察[J].第四军医大学学报,2004,25(15):1419-1421.

[10]杨跃进,罗彤,高润霖,等.首次心肌梗死后择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的长期预后分析[J].中华心血管病杂志,2003,31(11):818-821.

[11]赵明中,胡大一,李文恒,等.危险评分对急性心肌梗死急诊介入干预患者远期预后的评价[J].中华内科杂志,2004,43(8):584-587

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2006-12-06.作者简介:刘积伦,主治医师Email:ljl215@sohu.com
更新日期/Last Update: