我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

血管迷走神经性晕厥患者发病诱因及先兆症状分析

《心脏杂志》[ISSN:1009-7236/CN:61-1268/R]

期数:
2009年第2期
页码:
251
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2009-03-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of predisposing causes and premonitory symptoms of vasovagal syncope
作者:
陈智; 孟素荣; 周国忠; 冯旭光; 陈溢琳; 邓春凤
南方医科大学附属南方医院心内科，广东 广州 510515
Author(s):
CHEN Zhi;  MENG Su-rong;  ZHOU Guo-zhong;  FENG Xu-guang;  CHEN Yi-lin;  Deng Chun-feng
Department of Cardiology, Nanfang Hospital, Nanfang University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong, China
关键词:
血管迷走神经性晕厥; 直立倾斜试验; 晕厥诱因; 先兆症状
Keywords:
vasovagal syncope; head-up tilt test; syncope inducement; prodrome
分类号:
R364.134
DOI:
-
文献标识码:
A
摘要:
目的 分析血管迷走神经性晕厥患者常见晕厥诱因及先兆症状特点。方法 分析167 例接受住院治疗的不明原因晕厥患者晕厥诱因及晕厥先兆症状，并与直立倾斜试验（HUTT）结果进行相关性分析。结果 阳性反应120 例（71.8%），其中混合型占60.0%，血管抑制型占25.8%，心脏抑制型占14.2%；67.1%和93.4%不明原因晕厥患者存在晕厥诱因和先兆症状；常见的诱因有持久站立（42.9%），体位改变（21.4%），闷热环境（15.2%）等；总结了10个常见的与晕厥相关的先兆症状，其中头晕（76.6%），苍白（26.9%），乏力（52.6%），恶心或呕吐（44.9%），出汗（46.1%），感觉异常（14.9%），心悸（25.1%），黑曚（22.8%），胸闷（5.9%），听力减退（27.5%）；用Logistic回归分析发现头晕(OR:5.972,CI=2.013-17.453,P=0.001),恶心或呕吐(OR:5.774,CI=1.475-22.611，P=0.012),乏力(OR:4.048,CI=1.101-14.889,P=0.039),出汗(OR:3.36,CI=1.061-10.610,P=0.035)能够预测HUTT阳性结果。结论 详细询问晕厥患者的诱因及先兆症状，有助于我们对血管迷走神经性晕厥的诊断。
Abstract:
AIM To study the characteristics of predisposing causes and premonitory symptoms of vasovagal syncope. METHODS Predisposing causes and premonitory symptoms of 167 hospitalized patients with unexplained syncope were analyzed and compared with the results of heat-up tilt testing on the correlation. RESULTS One hundred and twenty (71.8%) patients had a positive result. The most common type of response was mixed type (60.0%), followed by vasodepressor (25.8%) and cardioinhibitory (14.2%) types. Totally, 67.1 % and 93.4 % of the patients with unexplained syncope had predisposing causes and premonitory symptoms. The most common predisposing causes were prolonged standing (42.9%), change of position (21.4%), and hot or warm environments (15.2%). Ten common premonitory symptoms about the vasovagal syncope were dizziness (76.6%), pale (26.9%), hypodynamia (52.6%), nausea or vomiting (44.9%), sweating (46.1%), paraesthesia (14.9%), palpitation (25.1%), amaurosis (22.8%), chest distress (5.9%), and amblyacousia (27.5%). Among patients with a positive response, dizziness (OR: 5.972, CI=2.013-17.453, P=0.001), vomiting (OR: 5.774, CI=1.475-22.611, P=0.012), hypodynamia (OR: 4.048, CI=1.101-14.889, P=0.039), and sweating (OR: 3.36, CI=1.061-10.610, P=0.035) could predict the positive result of HUTT. CONCLUSION Detailed inquiry about predisposing causes and premonitory symptoms is of great help in correct diagnosis of vasovagal syncope.

参考文献/References

[1］ Farwell D, Sulke N. How do we diagnose syncope?［J］. J Cardiovasc Electrophysio, 2002, 13(1 Suppl):S9-S13.

［2］ Fenton AM, Hammill SC, Rea RF, et al.Vasovagal syncope［J］. Ann Intern Med, 2000, 133(9):714-725.

［3］ Sagrista-Sauleda J, Romero-Ferrer B, Moya A, et al. Variations in diagnostic yield of head-up tilt test and electrophysiology in groups of patients with syncope of unknown origin［J］. Eur Heart J, 2001, 22(10):857-865.

［4］ Fujimura O, Yee R, Klein G, et al. The diagnostic sensitivity of electrophysiologic testing in patients with syncope caused by transient bradycardia［J］. N Engl J Med, 1989, 321(25):1703-1707.

［5］ Ector H, Willems R, Heidbüchel H, et al. Repeated tilt testing in patients with tilt-positive neurally mediated syncope［J］. Europace, 2005, 7(6):628-633.

［6］ Morillo CA. Evidence-based common sense: the role of clinical history for the diagnosis of vasovagal syncope［J］. Eur Heart J, 2006,27(3):344-350.

［7］ Folino AF, Buja G, Martini B, et al. Upright tilt test:correlation between results and patient clinical features［J］. PACE, 1996, 19(11 Pt 1):1582-1587.

［8］ Oh JH, Kim JS, Kwon HC, et al. Predictors of positive head-up tilt test in patients with suspected neurocardiogenic syncope or presyncope［J］. PACE, 2003, 26(2 Pt 1):593-598.

［9］ Gielerak G, Guzik P, Makowski K, et al. Haemodynamic indices of the early phase of the tilt test: does measurement predict outcome?［J］. Kardiol Pol, 2005, 63(3):244-251.

［10］Emkanjoo Z, Alizadeh A, Alasti M, et al. Correlation between results of head-up tilt test and clinical features in patients with syncope or presyncope［J］. J Electrocardiol, 2007, 40(2):200-202.

［11］Asensio E, Oseguera J, Loria A, et al. Clinical findings as predictors of positivity of head-up tilt table test in neurocardiogenic syncope［J］. Arch Med Res, 2003, 34(4):287-291.

［12］Asensio E, Oseguera J, Loria A, et al. Clinical findings as predictors of positivity of head-up tilt table test in neurocardiogenic syncope［J］. Arch Med Res, 2003, 34(4):287-291.

［13］Soteriades ES, Evans JC, Larson MG, et al. Incidence and prognosis of syncope［J］. N Engl J Med, 2002, 347(12):878-885.

［14］Naschitz JE, Mussafia-Priselac R. Patterns of hypocapnia on tilt in patients with fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, nonspecific dizziness, and neurally mediated syncope［J］. Am J Med Sci, 2006, 331(6):295-303.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2008-9-2.基金项目：广东省科技计划项目资助（73011） 通讯作者：孟素荣，教授，主要从事心脏起搏与电生理研究Email:mengsurong@163.com 作者简介：陈智，硕士生Email:cz7310@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2009-04-16