我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

急性心肌梗死患者远期预后因素分析

《心脏杂志》[ISSN:1009-7236/CN:61-1268/R]

期数:
2015年第3期
页码:
310-313
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2015-01-11

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of prognostic factors in patients with acute myocardial infarction
作者:
陈文韬1; 刘 伟2; 程 峰3; 张文松3
（1.鄂州市中心医院心内科，湖北 鄂州 436000；
2.宜昌市中心医院心内科，湖北 宜昌 443000；
3.十堰市人民医院心内科, 湖北 十堰 442000）
Author(s):
CHEN Wen-tao1;  LIU Wei2;  CHENG Feng3;  ZHANG Wen-song3
(1.Department of Cardiology, Ezhou Central Hospital, Ezhou 436000, Hubei, China；
2.Department of Cardiology, Yichang Central Hospital, Yichang 443000, Hubei, China；
3.Departmen of Cardiology, Shiyan People’s Hospital, Shiyan 442000, Hubei, China)
关键词:
心肌梗死; 急性; 远期预后; 预后因素
Keywords:
acute myocardial infraction;  long-term prognosis;  prognostic factors
分类号:
R541.4
DOI:
-
文献标识码:
A
摘要:
目的:对急性心肌梗死（AMI）患者进行随访调查，了解其远期预后情况，探讨影响AMI患者远期预后因素。方法:回顾性分析三家三甲医院2003年1月~2013年12月初次确诊的AMI患者4 887例，收集其病例资料和初次实验室检查结果，电话随访患者出院后的服药及临床转归。根据临床结局的不同，将患者分为预后良好组和预后不良组，探讨可能影响AMI患者远期预后的因素。结果:4 887例患者中，预后良好患者3 829例（78.4%）；预后不良1 058例（21.6%），包括死亡116例，再发心肌梗死32例，心力衰竭910例。①预后不良组患者的性别，体质量，心率，收缩压水平，舒张压水平，左室舒张末内径(LVEDD)，心肌钙蛋白T(cTnT)，脑钠尿肽(BNP)，餐后2h血糖(Ph2PG)，低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)，总胆固醇(TC)水平与预后良好组之间有显著性差异（P<0.05或P<0.01）；②预后不良组患者的高血压病，糖尿病，慢性肺部疾病，心房颤动，恶性肿瘤的发生率均高于预后良好组，差异有统计学意义(P<0.05或P<0.01)。多变量Logistical回归分析显示影响长期预后的因素为LVEDD（OR=3.10，P<0.01，CI 2.83-186.44），LDL-C（ OR=2.90，P<0.01，CI 2.08-156.87）。结论:增大的LVEDD，增高的LDL-C可能为影响AMI患者远期预后因素。
Abstract:
AIM:To investigate the long-term prognosis and the related factors in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS: Clinical data of 4 887 cases diagnosed as AMI between January 2003 and December 2013 in our three hospitals in Hubei Province were analyzed. Medical records, initial laboratory test results, medication compliance after discharge and clinical outcomes were collected. According to different clinical outcomes, patients were divided into good outcome group and poor outcome group. Single and multiple factor logistic regression analyses were performed to explore the risk factors that may affect the long-term prognosis. RESULTS: Among the 4 887 AMI cases, 3 829 cases had good outcomes and 1 058 had poor outcomes, including 116 deaths, 32 recurrent myocardial infractions and 910 heart failures. Gender, weight, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, left ventricular diameter, cTnT, BNP, Glu-2h, LDL-C, and cholesterol in the poor outcome group were significantly higher than those in the good outcome group (P>0.05). Incidence rates of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, COPD, atrial fibrillation and therioma in the poor outcome group were higher than those in the good outcome group (70.5% vs. 38.9, P<0.05; 59.9% vs. 33.4%, P<0.05; 19.5% vs. 4.9%, P<0.05; 1.1% vs. 0.3%, P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that left ventricular diameter (OR=3.10, P<0.01, CI 2.83-186.44) and LDL-C (OR=2.90, P<0.01, CI 2.08-156.87) were the risk factors affecting the long-term prognosis of AMI. CONCLUSION: Enlarged left ventricular diameter and LDL-C are the risk factors affecting the long-term prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

参考文献/References

[1]中华医学会心血管学分会,中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会,中国循环杂志编辑委员会.急性心肌梗死诊断和治疗指南[J].中华心血管病杂志,2001,12(29):705-719.
[2]Boersma E.Primary Coronary Angioplasty vs. Thrombolysis Group.Does time matter?A pooled analysis of randomized clinical trial comparing primary precutaneous coronary intervention and in-hospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infraction patiens[J].Eur Heart J,2006,27(7):779-788.
[3]Tok D,Turak O,Ozcan F,et al.Primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infraction in elderly aged 75 years and over:in-hospital mortality and clinical outcome[J].Turk kardivol Dern Ars,2012,40(7):565-573.
[4]Scoot M,Gund Y.Obesity, metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular Disease[J].J CLin Endocrinol Metab,2004,89(6):2595-2600.
[5]Yang ZJ,Liu J,Ge JP,et al.Prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factor in the Chineses population: the 2007-2008 China National Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders Study[J].Eur Heart J,2012,33(2):213-220
[6]Chan B,Yuan HT,Ananth Karumanchi S,et al.Receptor tyrosine kinase Tie-1 overexpression in endothelial cells upregulates adhesion molecules[J].Biophys Res Commun,2008,371(3):475-479.
[7]王吉耀.内科学[M].第2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:275-276.
[8]Reil JC,Mantini L,Hernandez-Bernal F,et al.Relevance of heart rate as a prognostic factor in patiens with acute myocardial infraction: insights from the GISSI-2 study[J].Eur Heart J,1998,19(Suppl F):F19-F26.
[9]Maagh P,Butz T,Wickenbrock I,et al.New-onset versus chronic atrial fibrillation in acute myocardial infraction:diffrerence in short and long-term follow-up[J]. Clin Res Cardiol,2011,100(2):167-175.
[10]顾 毅，时 德，赵 渝.肿瘤与静脉血栓形成的关系研究进展[J].中国癌症杂志,2002,12(1):85-88.
[11]Goldberg RJ,Currie K,White K,et al.Six-month outcomes in a multinational registry of patients hospitalized with an acute coronary syndrome[J].Am J Cardiol,2004,93(3):288-293.
[12]Palmer BR,Pilbrow AP,Yandle TG,et al.Angiotensin-converting enzyme gene polymorphism interacts with left ventricular ejection fraction and brain natriuretic peptide levels to predict mortality after myocardial infraction[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2003,41(5):729-736.
[13]Expert Panel on Detection,Evaluation,and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults.Executive Summary of The Thrid Report of The National Cholesterol Education program(NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection,Evaluation,And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults(Adult Treatment Panel III)[J].JAMA,2001,285(19):2486-2497.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2014-09-26.
作者简介：陈文韬，主治医师，硕士Email：cwtlovelife@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-02-03