我们的网站为什么显示成这样?

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式,您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本,以获取对此功能的支持,访问下面的网站,获取关于浏览器的信息:

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

桡动脉搏动图测量左室收缩时间间期的初步探讨(PDF)

《心脏杂志》[ISSN:1009-7236/CN:61-1268/R]

期数:
1994年第3期
页码:
142-144
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
1994-05-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Measurement of systolic time interval by radialis pulse tracing
作者:
谭学瑞 刘宝荔
西安医科大学第二临床学院 陕西 710004
Author(s):
Tan Xuerui Liu Baoli
Second Clinical College,Xi’an Medical University,Xi’an,Shaanxi 710004
关键词:
心脏功能试验心脏收缩间期桡动脉搏动图颈动脉搏动图
Keywords:
systole time intervalheart function testradialis pulse tracingcarotid Pulse tracing
分类号:
-
DOI:
-
文献标识码:
-
摘要:
应用CTH-Ⅱ型心功能微机检测仪和STI软件研究了70例受试者桡动脉搏动图(RPT),用以测量STI参数,并与经典的CPT法进行了比较。结果显示,两方法相关系数r为0.56与0.85,P<0.005。在变异方面未表明CPT优越。而RPT曲线便于获得,故在某些情况下RPT可以取代CPT用于STI测量。但两方法测得的LVET、PEP、PEP/LV ET有显著性差异,我们认为RPT测量STI应另行制订正常参考值。
Abstract:
The parameters of systolic time interva1(STI)obtained by radialis pulse tracing(RPT)were compared with those by conventional carotid pulse tracing(CPT)in 70 cases with a CTH-ⅡHeart Function Computer Monitor and STI software.The results showed that the parameters of STI from RPT and CPT were well correlated(r=0.56~0.85,P<0.005).Coefficient variations did not show the superiority of CPT.Since the curve of RPT could be obtained more easily and conveniently than that of RPT,RPT may provide an alternative to CPT for STI measurement.However.there were significant differences between the methods in LVET,PEP and PEP/LVET(P<0.01).It is suggested that the normal reference value of STI taken from RPT should be revised.

参考文献/References

[1]臧益民,谢 安,朱妙章,等.90例频域心电图与收缩间期(STI)的相关分析.心功能杂志 1989;1(1):41.

[2]戚仁锋,主编.颈动脉搏动图.诊断学.第3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,1992:225.

[3]顾菊康,朱妙章,臧益民,等.颈动脉搏动图 (全国暂行标准).心功能杂志 1989;1(1):6.

[4]CTH-Ⅱ心功能微机检测仪使用说明,西安:长通电器实业公司,19~25.

[5]Best & Taylor.Carotid sinus syndrome.The physiological basis of medical practice.5th ed.1951:286.

[6]彭 维,于皆平,郑守瑾,等.主编.Weiss-Baker综合征.临床综合征学.北京:人民卫生出版社,1989:585.

[7]张 澍,刘晓明,郭静萱,等.颈动脉窦过敏综合征三例.中华内科杂志 1993:32(1):57.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
Received 1993-03-19
更新日期/Last Update: 1994-05-01