我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

经桡动脉与经股动脉两种途径冠心病介入治疗的对比研究(PDF)

《心脏杂志》[ISSN:1009-7236/CN:61-1268/R]

期数:
2003年第3期
页码:
255-258
栏目:
介入治疗
出版日期:
2003-05-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
A comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary intervention by radial and femoral approaches
作者:
周景昱; 吕安林; 贾国良; 李兰荪; 王琼; 王小燕
第四军医大学西京医院心血管内科,陕西 西安 710032
Author(s):
ZHOU Jing-yu; Lv An-lin; JIA Guo-liang; LI Lan-sun; WANG Qiong; WANG Xiao-ya
Department of Cardiology,Xi jing Hospital,Fourth Military Medical University,Xi'an,Shaanxi 710032,China
关键词:
桡动脉; 股动脉; 冠状动脉疾病; 介入
Keywords:
radial; femoral; coronarydisease; intervention
分类号:
R540.46
DOI:
-
文献标识码:
A
摘要:
目的:比较经桡动脉途径和股动脉途径冠心病介入的手术方法、结果和并发症。方法:1033例冠心病住院患者分别接受经桡动脉(A)组(n=419)或经股动脉(F)组(n=614)途径的冠心病介入(PCI)治疗,观察两组手术成功率和并发症发生率。结果:两组患者PCI成功率没有显著性差异。A组局部血肿、不适反应等发生率显著低于F组,假性动脉瘤、动静脉瘘、局部感染及表皮坏死等并发症在A组未出现,F组分别发生11,4,6,7例,但两组间无显著性差异。两组均未出现远端肢体缺血、神经损伤等。结论:实施PCI术的两种途径都是安全、有效和可行的方法,与经股动脉比较,经桡动脉途径可减少并发症的发生。
Abstract:
AIM:To compare the radial approach with thefemoral approach forcoronary intervention in patients with coronary heart disease. METHODS: During 11 months,we performed consecutive coronary angiographies and angioplasties in 419 patients via radial artery with percutaneous approach (GroupA)and in 614 patients via femoral artery (GroupF). Exclusion criteria for transradial approach were the absence of radial pulse and abnormal Allen's test.Major complications in the two groups were recorded.RESULTS:The success rate was 98.6% (413/419) in Group A and 98.3% (603/614) in Group F(P>0.05).Minor hematoma occurred in 7 patients with transradial approach and in 72 with transfemoral approach (1.7% vs 11.7%,P<0.01).Major hematoma complications occurred in 2 patients in Group A and 16 patient in Group F (0.5% vs2.6%,P<0.05),In Group A,1 patient lost radial pulse during the 30-day follow upperiod. But none of the patients suffered pseudoaneurysm,arteriovenous fistula,and ischemia of the hand.CONCLUSION:Coronary intervention via the transradial approach is a safe and feasible alternative to the conventional transfemoral approach,with relatively fewer vascular complications and more comfort for the patient.

参考文献/References

[1]CampeauL.Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angioplasty [J] .Cathet Cardiovasc Diang,1989,16:3-7.

[2] Kiemeneij F,Laarman GJ.Percutaneous transradial artery approach for coronary Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation [J]. AmHeart J,1994,128:167-174.

[3]deBelder AJ,Smith RE,Wainwright RJ,et al. Transradial artery coronary angiography and intervention in patients with severe peripheral vascular disease [J]. Clin Radiol,1997,52:115-118.

[4] Yokoyama N, Takeshita S, Ochiai M, et al. Anatomic variations of the radial artery in patients undergoing transradial coronary intervention [J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2000,49:357-362.

[5]张绍祥,张显利,刘正津.左、右手动脉形态的比较研究[J].解剖学杂志,1991,14:374-376.

[6] Kiemeneij F, Laarman GH, Odekerken D,et al.Arandomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the access study [J].J Am Coll Cardiol,1997,29:1269-1275.

[7] Cooper CJ, El-Shiekh RA, Blaesing LD, et al. Patient preference for cardiac catheterization via the transfemoral approach [abstract] [J].J Am CollCardiol, 1997,29(supplA):310A.

[8] Nagai S, Abe S, Sato T, et al.Ultrasonic assessment of vascular complications in coronary angiography and angioplasty after transradial approach [J]. Am J Cardiol,1999,83:180-186.

[9] Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerken D,et al.A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty byradial, brachial and femoral approaches :the ACCESS study [J].J Am Coll Cardiol,1997,79:1239-1241.

[10] Otaki M.Percutaneous transradial approach for coronary angioplasty.Candiology [J].Am J Cardiol,1992,81:330-333.

[11] Lotan C,Hasin Y,Mosseri M,et al.Transradial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty [J].Am J Cardiol,1995,76:164-167.

[12]Barbeau GR,Carrier G,Ferland S, et al. Right transradial approach for coronary procedure:Preliminary result[J].J Invas Cardiol,1996,8:19D-21D. [13] Goldberg SL,Renslo R,Sinow R,et al. Learning curve in the use of the radial artery as vascular access in the performance of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty [J]. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn,1998,44:142-152.

[14] Spaulding C,Lefevre T,Funck F,et al.Left radial approach for coronary angiography :results of aprospective study [J]. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn, 1996,32:365-370.

[15] Benit E, Vranckx P, Jaspers L, et al. Frequency of a positive modified Allens test in 1,000 consercutive patients undergoing cardiac catheterization [J]. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn,1996,38:352-354.

[16] Louvard Y,Lefévre T, Morice MC.Radial approach:what about the learning curve? [J]. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn,1997,41:124-130.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2002-4-3.
更新日期/Last Update: 2003-05-01