我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

床旁紧急临时心脏起搏262例分析

《心脏杂志》[ISSN:1009-7236/CN:61-1268/R]

期数:
2012年第5期
页码:
622-624
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2012-10-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of temporary and urgent bedside heart pacemaker in 262 patients
作者:
张海成; 张晓琴; 肖世南; 韩 凯; 董卫锋; 鲁轩浩
(解放军第一医院心血管、肾脏病科，甘肃 兰州 730030)
Author(s):
ZHANG Hai-cheng;  ZHANG Xiao-qin;  XIAO Shi-nan;  HAN Kai;  DONG Wei-feng;  LU Xuan-hao
(Department of Cardiology and Nephrology, First Hospital of Chinese People’s Liberation Army, Lanzhou, Gansu 730030, China) )
关键词:
临时起搏器; 颈内静脉; 锁骨下静脉; 路径; 球囊漂浮起搏导管; 心律失常
Keywords:
temporary heart pacemaker;  internal jugular vein;  subclavian vein balloon flotation pacing catheter;  cardiac arrhythmia
分类号:
R541.1
DOI:
-
文献标识码:
A
摘要:
目的:评估床旁临时心脏起搏器安置术救治急危重患者心脏急症的可行性和有效性，分析不同静脉途径及电极导管的利弊。方法: 对262例伴发多种类型心律失常的患者在动态心电监测下采用床旁经静脉穿刺法行心脏临时起搏器安置术，入管路径依次为右侧颈内静脉136例次、双侧锁骨下静脉108例次、右侧股静脉18例次。评估临床可操作性、单次穿刺成功率、起搏成功率、术中及术后并发症等。结果: 254例次经床旁盲插导管成功起搏，成功率97.0%。4例在数字减影血管造影（DSA）引导下成功起搏，4例起搏失败。平均操作时间2～12 min。起搏器安置术中、起搏应用过程中共发生室速、血气胸、导管脱落、感知起搏不良等相关并发症27例，占10.3%。无室颤、心急穿孔等严重并发症。结论： 床旁临时心脏起搏术在心脏急危重患者特别是急性缓慢性心律失常的救治中具有快捷、损伤小、灵活性高、疗效好、并发症少等特点，特别是右侧颈内静脉路径及球囊漂浮起搏导管在危重症患者的综合救治中优势明显。
Abstract:
AIM:To evaluate the safety and validity of temporary, bedside pacemaker implanted in critically ill patients with cardiac emergency and to compare the utility of different venous pathways and electrode catheter. METHODS: A total of 262 patients with different types of arrhythmia received temporary bedside pacemaker implantation via right internal jugular vein, bilateral subclavian vein or right femoral vein access during an emergency to evaluate the clinical operation, single puncture success rate, pacing success rate, and intra- and postoperative complications. RESULTS: In 262 patients, blind insertion catheter pacing at bedside was successfully done in 254 patients with a success rate of 96.95%. Four patients with DAS were successful and four cases were unsuccessful. Average surgical time was 2-12min. Twenty-seven cases were complicated by ventricular tachycardia, hemipneumothorax, ductal exfoliation, and pacemaker malfunctions in pacemaker implantation and application. There were 10.3% of cases without serious complications such as ventricular fibrillation or perforation. CONCLUSION: Temporary bedside pacemaker implantation used for severe arrhythmia is timely, safe and effective. Notable, the right internal jugular vein path and balloon floating pacing catheter has been shown to have obvious advantages in critically ill patients with comprehensive treatment.

参考文献/References

[1]S.Serge Barold,Jacques Mugica.心脏起搏器的最新进展——21世纪的目标[M].郭继鸿，张海澄，译.北京:北京医科大学出版社,2000:125-127.
[2]李文斌，郭继鸿，张海澄，等.体表心电图指导床边心脏临时起搏器植入的价值[J].临床心电图学杂志,2007,8(1):20-22.
[3]Jemigan WR,Gardher WC,Mahr MM,et al.Use of the intermal jugular vein for placement of general cathater[J].Surg Cynecol obstet,1970,130(3):520-524.
[4]Sodeck GH,Domanovits H,Meron G,et al.Compromising bradycardia:management in the e-mergency department[J].Resuscitation,2007,73(1):96-102.
[5]Laczika K,Thalhammer F,Locker G,et al.Safe and efficient emergency transvenous ventricular pacingviathe right supraclavicular route[J].Anesth Analg,2000,90(4):784-789.
[6]杨红玲,黄新平,李慧娟，等.气囊漂浮电极床旁心脏起搏的临床应用[J].中国实用医药,2009,4(1):62-63.
[7]危小军，廖 伟，钟一鸣,等.床旁紧急临时心脏起搏治疗严重缓慢性心律失常疗效及安全性评价[J].临床荟萃,2007, 22(3):182-183.
[8]李学斌,李 鼎,郭继鸿,等.应用球囊漂浮电极导管心脏临时起搏的临床观察[J].中华心律失常杂志,2003,7(1):33.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2012-07-02.
作者简介：张海成，副主任医师Email：13919272222@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2012-11-16