文章摘要

文章信息/Info

Title:: Therapeutic effect of Thumper cardiopulmorary resuscitation system in the emergency treatment with sudden cardiac arrest

作者:: 龚黎¹; 孙宝玲²; 赵亚良¹; 樊颖³; 吴婷婷¹; 陈亚强¹; (1.解放军第323医院急诊科,陕西西安 710054；
2.解放军第518医院影像科,陕西西安 710031；
3.空军装备研究院门诊部，北京 100085)

Author(s):: GONG Li¹; SUN Bo-ling²; ZHAO Ya-liang¹; FAN Ying³; WU Ting-ting¹; CHEN Ya-qiang¹; (1.Department of Emergency, No. 323 Hospital, PLA, Xi’an 710054, Shaanxi, China；
2.Department of Imaging, No. 518 Hospital, PLA, Xi’an 710031, Shaanxi, China；
3.Department of Patient Care, Air Force Command Collge, PLA, Bejing 100085, China）

关键词:: 心脏骤停; 心肺复苏; 心肺复苏机; 萨勃; 标准心肺复苏; 效果

Keywords:: sudden cardiac arrest; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Thumper cardiopulmonary resuscitation system; traditional human/manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation; therapeutic effect

分类号:: R654.1

DOI:: -

文献标识码:: A

摘要:: 目的评价心肺复苏机抢救心脏骤停患者的治疗效果。方法将院内抢救的247例心脏骤停患者随机分为两组，分别用萨勃机进行心肺复苏（萨勃机组，n=112例）和采用标准心肺复苏法进行复苏（标准复苏组，n=135例）,除颤、药物应用等基本相同。比较两种方法对心肺复苏成功率及存活率的影响。结果两组患者抢救开始前的临床状况（年龄、性别、心率、呼吸频率、血压、血氧饱和度和病因类别等均无显著差异，萨勃机组复苏成功率（46.4%）和患者存活率（16.1%）均显著高于标准复苏组（分别是11.1%和4.4%），差异有统计学意义（均P<0.05）。结论萨勃机急救心脏骤停患者的效果优于标准心肺复苏法。

Abstract:: AIM To evaluate therapeutic effect of Thumper cardiopulmonary resuscitation system (TCPR) (an automatic mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation device) in the emergency treatment of cardiopulmorary resuscitation (CPR). METHODS To adopt a randomized controlled trial design, 247 cases with sudden cardiac arrest were randomly divided into two groups: TCPR group (use of TCPR, n=112) and traditional human/manual CPR group (HCPR, n=135). RESULTS Clinical reference (age, sex, heart rate, respiratory rate, blood presure, oxygen saturation and cause categories) of the two groups were comparable. Success rate and survival rate of the TCPR group were higher than the HCPR group (respectively, 46.4% vs. 11.1%; 16.1% vs. 4.4%, all P<0.05). CONCLUSION Therapeutic effects of TCPR used during CPR were better than results with HCPR.

参考文献/References

[1]傅一明,吴先荣,甘枚,等.呼吸支持治疗在心肺复苏中的应用[J].广西医学,2000,22(2):378.
[2]邝贺龄.内科急症治疗学[M].第3版.上海:科学技术出版社,1998.
[3]Kouweuhoven WB,Jude JR,Knickerbocke R,et al.Closed chest massage[J].JAMA,1960,173(9):1064-1067.
[4]Dickinson ET,Verdile VP,Schneider RM.Effectiveness of mechanical versus manual chest comp ressions in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resustcitation: A pilot study[J].Am J Emerg Med,1998,16(3):289-292.
[5]方锐，孟新科.两种不同通气方法对心肺复苏效果的对比研究[J].中国急救医学,2003,23(7):501-502.
[6]王立群，程显声.应重视超长心肺复苏[J].中国危重病急救医学,2002,14(4):195-196.

我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

萨勃心肺复苏机抢救心脏骤停患者的效果

《心脏杂志》[ISSN:1009-7236/CN:61-1268/R]

文章信息/Info

参考文献/References

备注/Memo

常用功能

导航/Navigate

工具/Tools

统计/Statistics