我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

FFR指导下功能性完全血运重建对NSTEMI并发多支病变患者短期预后影响

《心脏杂志》[ISSN:1009-7236/CN:61-1268/R]

期数:
2018年第1期
页码:
58-061
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2017-10-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
Prognostic impact of functionally completely revascularization guided by fractional flow reserve in patients with non ST-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease
作者:
郭 欣1; 2; 王 熠2; 马民华2; 吴 宾1; 杨兴军1; 李 飞1
(1.第四军医大学西京医院心血管内科，陕西 西安 7100322；2.解放军第531医院心血管内科，吉林 通化134002)
Author(s):
GUO Xin1; 2;  WANG Yi2;  MA Min-hua2;  WU Bin1;  YANH Xing-jun2;  LI Fei2
(Department of Cardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Fourth Military University, Xi’an 710032, Shaanxi, China; 2.Department of Cardiology, the 531 Hospital Of People's Liberation Army, Tonghua 134002, Jilin, China)
关键词:
血流储备分数; 非ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死; 多支病变; 功能性完全血运重建; 完全血运重建
Keywords:
fractional flow reserve;  non ST-elevation myocardial infarction;  multivessel disease;  functionally complete revascularization;  complete revascularization
分类号:
R541.4
DOI:
-
文献标识码:
A
摘要:
目的 评价血流储备分数（FFR）指导下功能性完全血运重建对非ST段抬高型心肌梗死（NSTEMI）并发多支病变患者短期预后的影响。方法 选取西京医院心血管内科95例NSTEMI并发多支病变患者为功能性完全血运重建组(冠脉造影狭窄>90%的病变直接行PCI治疗，对狭窄70%~90%的病变行FFR检查，FFR<0.75为PCI治疗的指征)，同时期冠脉造影指导下完全血运重建的患者为对照(解剖学完全血运重运组)组（狭窄≥70%且直径>2.5 mm的病变常规行PCI治疗）。患者随访12个月，比较两组患者主要不良心血管事件（MACE）及再发心绞痛、因冠心病再住院发生情况和左室射血分数(LVEF)的变化。结果 与对照组比较，功能性完全血运重建组再发心绞痛〔9% vs. 30%,P<0.01〕、因冠心病再住院〔5% vs. 19%,P<0.01〕及MACE〔9% vs. 22%,P<0.05〕发生率均显著降低；两组LVEF均较术前增加〔(60±7)% vs.(56±8)%〕，功能性完全血运重建组增加显著(均P<0.05)。结论 FFR指导下功能性完全血运重建能降低患者12个月MACE发生率，减少再发心绞痛、因冠心病再住院次数，改善患者左心功能，患者近期获益明显。
Abstract:
AIM To evaluate the prognotic influence of functional completely revascularization guided by fractional flow reserve (FFR) in patients with non ST-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease. METHODS 95 cases of patients with non ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and multivessel disease were chosen as the functional completely revascularization group. Same period reascularization patients served as the control group. Patients were followed up for 12 months, the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and changes in left ventricular ejection fraction were compared. RESULTS Compared with the control group, the functional completely revascularization group had a lower incidence in recurrence angina, coronary heart disease hospital again and MACE (P<0.05). Both of the two groups had an increased LVEF, which was more significantly increased in the functional completely reascularization group (P<0.05). CONCLUSION Functional completely revascularization guided by FFR reduces the incidence of MACE at one year, the number of angina pectoris and coronary heart disease hospital readmission, and improves left cardiac function of patients.

参考文献/References

[1]马尼什,周淑娴,雷 娟,等.非 ST 段抬高心肌梗死 216 例临床回顾性分析[J/CD].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2008,2(8):892-899.

[2]刘国斌，陈洁茹，张 弋，等.186 例急性非ST段抬高心肌梗死患者急诊诊疗状况回顾性分析[J].中国急救医学,2010,30(7):608-610.

[3]Boden WE,ORourke RA,Teo KK,et al.Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease[J].N Engl J Med,2007,356(15):1503-1516.

[4]马士新，魏 盟.血管内超声及血流储备分数在功能性完全血运重建中的价值[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志2015,23（6):347.

[5]中华医学会心血管病学分会,中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会.非ST段抬高急性冠脉综合征诊断与治疗指南[J].中华心血管病杂志,2012,40(5):353-367.

[6]Sorajja P,Gersh BJ,Cox DA,et al.Impact of multivessel disease on reperfusion success and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction[J].Eur Heart J,2007,28(14):1709-1716.

[7]Wu C,Dyer AM,King SB,et al.Impact of incomplete revascularization on long-term mortality after coronary stenting[J].Circ Cardiovasc Interv,2011,4(5):413-421.

[8]Navarese EP,De Servi S,Buffon A,et al.Clinical impact of simultaneous complete revascularization vs.culprit only primary angioplasty in patients with St-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease:a meta-analysis[J].J Thromb Thrombolysis,2011,31(2):217-225.

[9]Tonino PA,De Bruyne B,Pijls NH,et al.Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary Intervention[J].N Engl J Med,2009,360(3):213-224.

[10]Kereiakes DJ.Reassessing the importance of complete versus incomplete coronary revascularization[J].Rev Cardiovasc Med,2014,15(1):24-30.

[11]Pijls NH,Van sehaardenhurgh P,Manoharan G,et al.Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionly nonsignificant stenosis:5-year follow-up Of the DEFER Study[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2007,49(27):2105-2111.

[12]Fang Y,Gu CX,Wei H,et al.Surgical revascularization of patients with chronic total coronary occlusion combined diffuse distal atherosclerosis[J].Chin J Geriatr,2010,29:452-455.

[13]Park SJ,Ahn JM,Kang SJ.Paradigm shift to functional angioplasty:new insights for fractional flow reserve-and intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention[J].Circulation,2011,124(8):951-957.

[14]Lee BK,Choi HH,Hong KS,et al.Efficacy of fractional flow reserve measurements at side branch vessels treated with the crush stenting technique in true coronary bifurcation lesions[J].Clin Cardiol,2010,33(8):490-494.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2017-03-01.作者简介：王学忠，副主任医师，博士 Email：wxz27006@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01