我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

完全血运重建对DES治疗三支病变患者疗效的评估

《心脏杂志》[ISSN:1009-7236/CN:61-1268/R]

期数:
2010年第5期
页码:
708-711
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2010-06-22

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of complete and incomplete revascularization in severe coronary heart disease patients with three-vessel disease after drug-eluting stent implantation
作者:
张东伟; 王琼; 王海昌; 郭文怡; 李伟杰; 栾荣华; 李成祥
第四军医大学西京医院心脏内科，陕西 西安 710032
Author(s):
ZHANG Dong-wei;  WANG Qiong;  WANG Hai-chang;  GUO Wen-yi;  LI Wei-jie;  LUAN Rong-hua;  LI Cheng-xiang
Department of Cardiology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an 710032, Shaanxi, China
关键词:
药物洗脱支架; 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗; 三支病变; 完全血运重建; 非完全血运重建
Keywords:
acute myocardial infarction;  young and middle-aged patients;  therapeutic strategy;  percutaneous coronary intervention;  thrombolysis
分类号:
R541.4
DOI:
-
文献标识码:
A
摘要:
目的: 探讨是否完全血运重建对接受药物洗脱支架（DES）治疗的冠心病三支病变患者临床疗效的分析。评价SYNTAX评分对三支病变患者治疗策略的指导意义。方法: 分析行DES植入治疗的118例三支病变患者，进行SYNTAX评分。根据是否完全血运重建分为两组。对两组患者术后3年的死亡、再次心绞痛复发、非致命性心肌梗死、非致死性脑卒中和再次血运重建事件进行随访，并综合SYNTAX评分进行分析。结果: 两组间各种心脑血管不良事件（MACCE）无统计学差异，但再次心绞痛复发、再次血运重建两类事件在非完全血运重建组有增高趋势，至非完全血运重建组总体MACCE发生率高于完全血运重建组，具有统计学差异（37% vs. 12%，P<0.05）。非完全血运重建组较完全血运重建组总体MACCE发生率在SYNTAX评分高计分、中低计分患者中均表现出增高趋势，且高计分患者更明显，但差异均未达到显著水平。结论: 接受DES植入治疗的三支病变患者完全血运重建效果好于非完全血运重建，SYNTAX高计分患者更明显。
Abstract:
AIM: To investigate the clinical effects of complete and incomplete revascularization in severe coronary heart disease (CHD) patients with three-vessel disease after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation and to assess the significance of SYNTAX score in the treatment strategy for patients with three-vessel disease. METHODS: Included in this retrospective study were 118 consecutive CHD patients with three-vessel disease who had undergone successful DES implantation. Patients were divided into two groups: complete revascularization group and incomplete revascularization group. The occurrence of adverse events such as death, recurrence of angina, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke and revascularization was followed up for 3 years after DES implantation and was analyzed with SYNTAX score. RESULTS: No significant difference was found in the incidence of MACCE adverse events including death, recurrence of angina, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke and revascularization between groups but the total incidence of MACCE adverse events was significantly higher in the incomplete revascularization group compared with that in the complete revascularization group (19.4% vs. 8.9%, P<0.05). Compared with that in the complete revascularization group, a more increased tendency in the incidence of MACCE adverse events was found in the high and moderate scoring subgroups of SYNTAX score, more marked in the high score subgroup in the incomplete revascularization group. CONCLUSION: Effects of complete revascularization are much better than those of incomplete revascularization in CHD patients with three-vessel disease after DES implantation, especially in patients with high SYNTAX score.

参考文献/References

［1］Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease［J］. N Engl J Med, 2009, 360（10）:961-972.

［2］ Sianos G, Morel MA, Kappetein AP, et al. The SYNTAX score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease［J］. EuroIntervention, 2005, 1（2）:219-227.

［3］Patel MR, Dehmer GJ, Hirshfeld JW, et al. ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC 2009 Appropriateness Criteria for Coronary Revascularization［J］. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2009, 53（6）：530-553.

［4］Serruys PW, Lemos PA, van Hout BA. Sirolimus eluting stent implantation for patients with multivessel disease: rationale for the Arterial Revascularisation Therapies Study part II (ARTS II)［J］. Heart, 2004, 90(9):995-998.

［5］Moon MR, Sundt TM 3rd, Pasque MK, et al. Influence of internal mammary artery grafting and completeness of revascularization on long term outcome in octogenarians［J］. Ann Thorac Surg, 2001, 72（6）:2003 -2007.

［6］ Mariani G, De Servi S, Dellavalle A, et al. Complete or incomplete percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients with unstable angina in stent era: Are early and one-year results different?［J］. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2001, 54（4）:448-453.

［7］ Osswald BR, Tochtermann U, Schweiger P, et al. Does the completeness of revascularization contribute to an improved early survival in patients up to 70 years of age?［J］. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2001, 49（6）:373-377.

［8］ Kloeter UC , Jander NG, Buser PT, et al. Long term outcome of angioplasty for multivessel coronary disease: importance and price of complete revascularization［J］. Int J Cardiol, 2001, 79（2）:197-205.

[9]Hernandez-Antolin RA, Alfonso F, Goicolea J, et al. Results (>6 months) of stenting of > 1 major coronary artery in multivessel coronary artery disease［J］. Am J Cardiol, 1999, 84（2）:147-151.

[10]Mathew V, Rihal CS, Berger PB, et al. Clinical outcome of patients undergoing multivessel coronary stent implantation［J］. Int J Cardiol, 1998, 64（1）:1-7.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2009-01-06.通讯作者：王海昌，主任医师，主要从事心律失常、冠心病的基础与介入治疗研究 Email：wanghc@fmmu.edu.cn 共同通讯作者：王琼，副主任医师，主要从事冠心病基础与介入治疗研究Email：wangqiong@fmmu.edu.cn 作者简介：张东伟，硕士生Email：zhdwuu@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2010-06-22