我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

右心室流出道间隔部起搏对心房颤动患者血流动力学和心功能的影响

《心脏杂志》[ISSN:1009-7236/CN:61-1268/R]

期数:
2011年第6期
页码:
770-774
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2011-12-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of right ventricular outflow tract septum pacing on hemodynamics and cardiac function
作者:
鲜玉琼; 郑昌柱; 金 环; 陈 静; 王玉华; 徐迎辉; 居海宁
上海市第七人民医院心内科，上海 200137
Author(s):
XIAN Yu-qiong;  ZHENG Chang-zhu;  JIN Huan;  CHEN Jing;  WANG Yu-hua;  XU Ying-hui;  JU Hai-ning
Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Seventh People’s Hospital, Shanghai 200137, China
关键词:
右心室流出道间隔部; 起搏; 心室电同步性; 血流动力学; 心功能; 主要不良心血管事件
Keywords:
right ventricular outflow tract septum;  pacing;  electrical synchronization of ventricle;  hemodynamics;  cardiac function;  major adverse cardiovascular events
分类号:
R541.71
DOI:
-
文献标识码:
A
摘要:
目的:比较右心室流出道间隔部（RVOTS）起搏和右心室心尖部（RVA）起搏对心房颤动（房颤）患者血流动力学、心功能及主要不良心血管事件的影响，评价RVOTS起搏的中远期疗效。方法： 具备起搏器植入指征的慢性房颤患者68例，随机分配至RVOTS部起搏组(n=34)和RVA部起搏组(n=34)，均采用心室抑制型按需起搏模式（VVI），随访（27±10）个月。观察比较两组患者起搏时心电图QRS时限，血流动力学、心功能及主要不良心血管事件发生情况。结果： RVOTS组起搏心电图的QRS时限较RVA组显著缩短［(146±16) ms vs.(155±13) ms，P<0.05］。随访结束时，RVA组的左室射血分数（LVEF）较术前显著降低（0.58±0.10 vs. 0.64±0.12,P<0.05），左房内经（LAD）较术前显著扩大［（47±10） mm vs.(44±10) mm，P<0.05），在RVOTS组虽有类似的变化趋势［LVEF:0.59±0.08 vs. 0.63±0.11；LAD:(47±7) mm vs. (45±7) mm］，但均未达统计学差异，随访结束时两组间比较未达统计学差异；两组患者随访结束时血浆脑钠尿肽（BNP）水平均较术前显著增高［RVA组：（292±168） ng/L vs. (200±70) ng/L,P<0.01；RVOTS组：(225±88) ng/L vs.(192±69) ng/L,P<0.05］，RVA组增高更明显，且较同期RVOT组显著增高（P<0.05）；随访结束时，RVA组的平均NYHA心功能分级较术前显著增高(1.7±0.6 vs. 1.4±0.5,P<0.01) ； RVOTS组有类似的变化趋势（1.5±0.7 vs. 1.3±0.5）,但未达统计学差异，两组间实验后比较差异亦未达统计学意义。两组间因心衰住院率、脑梗死及因心血管死亡均无统计学差异。结论： RVOTS起搏的电和机械同步性比RVA起搏相对较好，其心功能损害及心脏重构也相对较轻，较RVA起搏接近生理。
Abstract:
AIM:To compare the effects of right ventricular outflow tract septum (RVOTS) pacing and right ventricular apex (RVA) pacing on hemodynamics, cardiac function and major adverse cardiovascular events, and to evaluate the long-term efficacy of RVOTS pacing. METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with chronic atrial fibrillation and with indications of pacing were randomly assigned to RVOTS pacing group (n=34) and RVA pacing group (n=34), and on-demand suppressed ventricular pacing mode (VVI) was used. All the patients were followed up for a mean of (27±10) months. QRS duration of electrocardiogram (ECG) in pacing, hemodynamics, cardiac function and the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events were observed and compared. RESULTS: The QRS duration of ECG in pacing in RVOTS group was significantly narrower than that in RVA group (P<0.05). At the end of follow-up, the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was lower (0.58±0.10 vs. 0.64±0.12, P<0.05) and the left atrium diameter (LAD) was larger ［(47±10) mm vs. (44±10) mm, P<0.05］ than those of the preoperative in RVA group. A similar trend was observed in the RVOTS group but no statistical differences were seen ［LVEF: 0.59±0.08 vs. 0.63±0.11; LAD: (47±7) mm vs. (45±7) mm］. At the end of follow-up, no statistical differences were observed between groups. Plasma levels of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) were significantly higher than those of preoperative in the two groups at the end of follow-up ［RVA group: (292±168)ng/L vs. (200±70)ng/L, P<0.01, RVOTS group: (225±88) ng/L vs. (192±69) ng/L, P<0.05］. The increase in RVA group was significantly higher than that in RVOTS group during the same period (P<0.05). At the end of follow-up, the mean NYHA classification of cardiac function was higher significantly than that of the preoperative in RVA group (1.7±0.60 vs. 1.4±0.5, P<0.01). A similar trend was observed in the RVOTS group (1.5±0.7 vs. 1.3±0.5), but there were no statistical differences. No statistical differences were observed at the end of follow-up and no statistical differences were observed in hospitalization rate for heart failure, cerebral infarction and cardiovascular death between groups. CONCLUSION: Compared with RVA pacing, RVOTS pacing keeps a better electrical and mechanical synchronization in ventricle, thus reducing the damage of cardiac function and cardiac remodeling. RVOTS pacing thus is more physiological than RVA pacing.

参考文献/References

[1]Charles RK,Stuart JC,Hoshiar A,et al.For the Canadian Trial of Physiological Pacing (CTOPP) Investigators.Canadian Trial of Physiological Pacing Effects of Physiological Pacing During Long-Term Follow-Up[J].Circulation,2004,109(3):357-362.

[2]Link MS,Helkamp AS,Estes NA 3rd,et al. High incidence of pacemaker syndrome in patients with sinus node dysfunction treated with ventricular-based pacing in the Mode Selection Trial (MOST)[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2004,43(11):2066-2071.

[3]Wilkoff BL,Cook JR,Epstein AE,et al.Dual-chamber pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillator: the Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) Trial[J].JAMA,2002,288(10):3115-3123.

[4]Winckels SK,Thomsen MB,Osterhoff P.High-septal pacing reduces ventricular electrical remodeling and proarrhythmia in chronic atrioventricular block dogs[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2007,50(9):906-913.

[5]Tse HF,Wong KK,Tsang V,et al.Functional abnormalities in patients with permanent right ventricular pacing, The effects of sites of electrical stimulation[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2002,40(8):1451-1458.

[6] 朱参战,崔长琮,张全发,等.多部位起搏的急性血流动力学对比研究[J].中国循环杂志,2002,17(2):127-127.

[7]郭诗东,华 伟，张澎，等.右心室间隔部起搏的血液动力学研究[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2005,13(2):81-83.

[8]Wiggers CJ.The muscle reactions of the mammalian ventricles to artificial surface stimuli[J].Am J Physiol,1925,73(12):346-378.

[9]Roulaeu F,Mehteb M,Gerffoy S,et al.Echocadriographic assessment of the intraventricular delay of activation and correlation of the QRS width in dilated cardiolmyopathy[J].Pacing Clin Electrophysiol,2001,24(10):1500-1507.

[10]Miyoshi F,Kobayashi Y,Itou H,et al.Prolonged paced QRS duration as a predictor for congestive heart failure in patients with right ventricular apical pacing[J].PACE,2005,28(11):1182-1187.

[11]Gong X,Su Y,Pan W,et al.Is right ventricular outflow tract pacing superior to right ventricular apex pacing in patients with normal cardiac function?[J].Clin Cardiol,2009,32(12):695-699.

[12]李晓平,李学文,王 健,等.右室心尖部与间隔部起搏对室壁运动的影响[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志,2010,24(1):27-30.

[13]Tse HF,Lau CP.Long term effect of right ventricular pacing on myocardial perfusion and function[J].J Am Coll Cardial,1997,29(4):744-749.

[14]曾 欣,何梅先.右室心尖部起搏的心室激动顺序对心功能的影响及可能机制[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志,2001,15(4):278-280.

[15]Owen CH,Esposito DJ,Davis JW,et al.The effects of ventricular pacing on left ventricular geometry, function, myocardial oxygen consumption,and efficiency of contraction in conscious dogs[J].Pacing Clin Electrophysiol,1998,21(7):1417-1429.

[16]Rosenqvist M,Bergfeldt L,Haga Y,et al.Effect of ventricular activation sequence on cardiac performance during pacing[J].Pacing Clin Electrophysiol, 1996,19(9):1279-1286.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2011-04-03.基金项目：上海市卫生系统重点学科建设项目基金资助(PWZXK2007-15) 通讯作者：郑昌柱，副主任医师，主要从事心肌缺血再灌注和生理性起搏的研究Email:lwqzcz@yahoo.com.cn 作者简介：鲜玉琼，副主任医师，硕士Email:xyqmender@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2011-12-27