应用主动脉内球囊反搏结合血管重建术治疗急性心肌梗死并发泵衰竭患者的效果
《心脏杂志》[ISSN:1009-7236/CN:61-1268/R]
- 期数:
- 2012年第5期
- 页码:
- 617-619，624
- 栏目:
- 临床研究
- 出版日期:
- 2012-10-25
文章信息/Info
- Title:
- Effect of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock
- Author(s):
- CUI Hai-ming; YANG Jing; REN Yu-sheng; LIANG Chun; PAN Xiao-ming; FAN Min; WU Zong-gui
- (Department of Cardiovasology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China)
- 分类号:
- R541.4
- DOI:
- -
- 文献标识码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 目的:观察应用主动脉内球囊反搏（IABP）结合血管重建术治疗急性心肌梗死并发泵衰竭患者的效果。方法： 2004年12月~2010年12月我院确诊急性心肌梗死并发泵衰竭并应用IABP的住院患者75（男54，女21）例。按是否做血管重建术分为两组：血管重建组和非血管重建组。所有患者均在药物治疗的基础上行IABP，所用反搏仪为AUTO CAT2或Datascope 98 system，血管重建组并行冠状动脉造影及经皮冠状动脉介入术(PCI)或冠脉旁路移植术（CABG）。结果： 全部75例患者中，IABP反搏时间2～336（90±75） h；死亡22例，病死率29%；血管重建组中63例行PCI术，1例行择期CABG,术后死亡14例，病死率22%；非血管重建组中死亡8例，病死率73%。血管重建组的病死率显著低于非血管重建组（P<0.01）,并发症共5例，发生率7%。结论： 在IABP的支持下，积极进行血管重建治疗可以降低急性心肌梗死并发泵衰竭患者的住院期间病死率。
- Abstract:
- AIM:To investigate the value of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) support therapy for patients suffering from acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated with cardiogenic shock. METHODS: Enrolled in the study were 75 consecutive patients ［mean age (69.7±10.2) years, 54 males］ diagnosed from December 2004 to December 2010 with AMI complicated with cardiogenic shock. All patients were treated with IABP, including PCI in 63 cases and CABG in one case. RESULTS: IABP time in the 75 cases was 2-336 h ［mean: (90.1±75.2) h］ and the overall in-hospital mortality was 29.3% (n=22): IABP with and without revascularization, respectively, 21.9% and 72.7%. Incidence of complications was 6.7% including puncture site bleeding in one patient, severe thrombocytopenia in one patient, a large area of cerebral infarction in one patient, and acute pancreatitis in two patients. CONCLUSION: IABP support with revascularization is an effective modality for AMI patients complicated with cardiogenic shock, which significantly lowers hospital mortality. However, the mortality rate remains high without revascularization.
参考文献/References
[1]Gunnar RM,Cruz A,Boswell J,et al.Myocardial infarction with shock. Hemodynamic studies and results of therapy[J].Circulation,1966,33(5):753-762.
[2]叶 璐，宋建平.主动脉内球囊反搏[J].心血管病学进展,2007,28(6):914-917.
[3]Holmes DR Jr.Cardiogenic shock:a lethal complication of acute myocardial infarction[J].Rev Cardiovasc Med,2003,4(3):131-135.
[4]计东群,贾之庆.现代心胸重症监护学治疗[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1997:79-85.
[5]Hands ME,Rutherford JD,Muller JE,et al.The in-hospital development of cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction:incidence, predictors of occurrence,outcome and prognostic factors.The MILIS Study Group[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,1989, 14(1):40-46.
[6] 魏妤，胡大一，崔亮，等. 主动脉内球囊反搏在高危急性心肌梗死患者辅助治疗中的作用[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2000,8(4):180-182.
[7]Unverzagt S,Machemer MT,Solms A,et al.Intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation (IABP) for myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock[J].Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2011,(7):CD007398.
[8]Aksoy O,Yousefzai R,Singh D,et al.Cardiogenic shock in the setting of severe aortic stenosis:role of intra-aortic balloon pump support[J].Heart,2011,97(10):838-843.
[9]Patel MR,Smalling RW,Thiele H,et al.Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation and infarct size in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction without shock:the CRISP AMI randomized trial[J].JAMA,2011,306(12):1329-1337.
[10]Zeymer U,Bauer T,Hamm C,et al.Use and impact of intra-aortic balloon pump on mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock:results of the Euro Heart Survey on PCI[J].Euro Intervention,2011,7(4):437-441.
[11]Trost JC,Hillis LD.Intra-Aortic Balloon Counterpulsation[J].Am J Cardiol,2006,97(9):1391-1398.
备注/Memo
- 备注/Memo:
- 收稿日期：2012-04-24.
通讯作者：任雨笙，主任医师，主要从事冠心病的临床和基础研究Email:renyusheng@gmail.com
作者简介：崔海明，住院医师Email:cuihaiming@sohu.com
常用功能
统计/Statistics
- 摘要浏览/Viewed1105
- 评论/Comments
