我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

肺部超声用于分析不同心力衰竭类型的比较及其与其他指标的相关性

《心脏杂志》[ISSN:1009-7236/CN:61-1268/R]

期数:
2018年第1期
页码:
26-029
栏目:
老年心血管病研究
出版日期:
2017-10-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of lung ultrasound in the application of different types of heart failure and its correlation with other indicators
作者:
杨菲菲; 张丽伟; 王秋霜; 黄党生; 沈 东; 马永江; 陈 强; 张梅青; 陈建梅
（解放军总医院第一附属医院心内科，北京 100037）
Author(s):
YANG Fei-fei;  ZHANG Li-wei;  WANG Qiu-shuang;  HUANG Dang-sheng SHEN Dong;  MA Yong-jiang;  CHEN Qiang;  ZHANG Mei-qing;  CHEN Jian-mei
(Department of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital, PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100037, China)
关键词:
肺部超声; 急性心力衰竭; B线; 超声心动图; 氨基末端脑钠尿肽原
Keywords:
lung ultrasound;  acute heart failure;  B line;  echocardiography;  NT-proBNP
分类号:
R541.6
DOI:
-
文献标识码:
A
摘要:
目的 比较肺部超声在不同心衰(HF)类型中应用的差异，并分析肺部超声与其他指标的相关性。方法 124例急性HF患者，射血分数(EF)保留型HF组（HFpEF）48例；EF减低型HF组(HFrEF)76例。比较2组间临床资料以及心肺超声指标的差异，并进一步分析肺水B线在两种HF类型中分别与氨基末端脑钠尿肽原（NT-proBNP）、E/e’和左室EF（LVEF）的相关性的差异。结果 HFpEF组和HFrEF组两组患者在基本临床资料方面均无明显统计学差异； HFpEF组的LVEF、室间隔厚度明显高于HFrEF组，而左室舒张末期内径、左室收缩末期内径、下腔静脉直径均明显小于HFrEF组。两组患者的左房前后径、E/A、肺动脉压（PAP）、E/e’和B线均无明显统计学差异。在HFpEF组中B线与E/e’的相关性优于NT-proBNP（r=0.886,r=0.755）,而在 HFrEF组中肺水B线与NT-proBNP的相关性优于E/e’（r=0.829,r=0.737）。结论 无论HFpEF，还是HFrEF，B线与NT-proBNP、E/e’均有良好的正相关性。
Abstract:
AIM To investigate the differences of lung ultrasound in different types of heart failure and to analyze the correlation between lung ultrasound and other indexes. METHODS 124 consecutive acute heart failure patients were divided into two groups, including preserved ejection fraction heart failure (HFpEF) and reduced ejection fraction heart failure (HFrEF). To compare differences of the two groups in clinical data and cardiopulmonary ultrasound measurements, additional investigation was performed to evaluate whether there was a difference in correlating between B lines with N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)、E/e’, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in the two types of heart failure. RESULTS There was no significant difference in clinical data between HFpEF and HFrEF groups. The LVEF and interventricular septal thickness of the HFpEF group were significantly higher than that of the HFrEF group, but the left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, end-systolic diameter and inferior vena cava diameter were significantly smaller than that of HFrEF group. B lines had no significant differences between the two groups, The correlation between B lines and E/e’ was better than NT-proBNP in HFpEF group (r=0.886, r=0.755), and the correlation between B lines and NT-proBNP was better than E/e’ in the HFrEF group (r=0.829, r=0.737). CONCLUSION There was a significant positive correlation between B lines and NT-proBNP, E/e’, regardless of HFpEF or HFrEF.

参考文献/References

[1]van Riet EE, Hoes AW, Wagenaar KP, et al. Epidemiology of heart failure: the prevalence of heart failure and ventriculardysfunction in older adults over time. A systematic review［J］. Eur J Heart Fail, 2016, 18(3):242-252.

[2]Abebe TB, Gebreyohannes EA,Tefera YG, et al. Patients with HFpEF and HFrEF have different clinical characteristics but similar prognosis:a retrospectivecohort study［J］. BMC Cardiovasc Disord, 2016, 16(1):232.

[3]Fonarow GC, Stough WG, Abraham WT, et al. Characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of patientswith preserved systolic function hospitalized for heart failure: a report fromthe OPTIMIZE-HF Registry［J］. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007; 50(8):768-777.

[4]Martinez-Brana L, Mateo-Mosquera L, Bermudez-Ramos M, et al. Clinical characteristics and prognosis of heart failure in elderly patients［J］. Rev Port Cardiol, 2015, 34(7-8):457-463.

[5]Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults:an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging[J].J Am Soc Echocardiogr,2015,28(1):1-39.

[6]Volpicelli G,Elbarbary M,Blaivas M,et al.International Liaison Committee on Lung Ultrasound(ILC-LUS)for International Consensus Conference on Lung Ultrasound(ICC-LUS).International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound[J].Intensive Care Med,2012,38(4):577-591.

[7]Ambrosy AP,Fonarow GC,Butler J,et al.The global health and economic burden of hospitalizations for heart failure:lessons learned from hospitalized heart failure registries[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2014,63(12):1123-1133.

[8]Owan TE,Hodge DO,Herges RM,et al.Trends in prevalance and outcome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction[J].N Engl J Med,2006,355(3):251-259.

[9]Little WC,Oh JK.Echocardiographic evaluation of diastolic function can be used to guide clinical care[J].Circulation,2009,120(9):802-809.

[10]Nagueh SF,Smiseth OA,Appleton CP,et al.Recommendations for the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function by Echocardiography:An Update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging[J].J Am Soc Echocardiogr,2016,29(4):277-314.

[11]Matsushita K,Minamishima T,Goda A,et al.Comparison of the reliability of E/E' to estimate pulmonary capillary wedge pressure in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction versus those with reduced ejection fraction[J].Int J Cardiovasc Imaging,2015,31(8):1497-1502.

[12]Lichtenstein D.Ultrasound diagnosis of pulmonary edema[J].Rev Imag Med,1994,6:561-562.

[13]Al Deeb M,Barbic S,Featherstone R,et al.Point-of-care ultrasonography for the diagnosis of acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema in patients presenting with acute dyspnea:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Acad EmergMed,2014,21(8):843-852.

[14]Pivetta E,Goffi A,Lupia E,et al.Lung ultrasound-implemented diagnosis of acute decompensated heart failure in the ED:a SIMEU Multicenter Study[J].Chest,2015,148(1):202-210.

[15]Jambrik Z,Monti S,Coppola V,et al.Usefulness of ultrasound lung comets as a nonradiologic sign of extravascular lung water[J].Am J Cardiol,2004,93(10):1265-1270.

[16]Agricola E,Bove T,Oppizzi M,et al.“Ultrasound comet-tail images”:A marker of pulmonary edema:A comparative study with wedge pressure and extravascular lung water[J].Chest,2005,127(5):1690-1695.

[17]Tsverava M,Tsverava D.“Comet tail”artefact in diagnosis of pulmonary congestion in patients with diastolic heart failure[J].Georgian Med News,2010,187(1):28-35.

[18]聂 昆，吴 文，孟 军,等.肺部超声“彗尾征”对舒张性心力衰竭的诊断价值[J].临床超声医学杂志,2016,18(5):308-311.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2017-08-22.通讯作者：张丽伟，副主任医师，主要从事冠心病介入治疗和心力衰竭诊治研究Email：liweizh304@sina.com 作者简介：杨菲菲，主治医师，博士 Email：cardiofeifei115@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01