我们的网站为什么显示成这样？

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式，您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本，以获取对此功能的支持，访问下面的网站，获取关于浏览器的信息：

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

主动脉内球囊反搏术在重症冠心病冠状动脉旁路移植围手术期中的应用

《心脏杂志》[ISSN:1009-7236/CN:61-1268/R]

期数:
2014年第5期
页码:
591-594
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2014-05-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Intra-aortic balloon pump during the perioperative period of high-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: a clinical study
作者:
宿学家1; 张慧颖2; 张志勇1; 范 波1; 林庆录3; 李松龄3
（解放军第88医院：1.心胸外科 3.麻醉科，山东 泰安 271000；
2.泰安军分区干休一所，山东 泰安 271000）
Author(s):
SU Xue-jia1;  ZHANG Hui-ying2;  ZHANG Zhi-yong1;  FAN Bo1;  LIN Qing-lu3;  LI Song-ling3
(1.Department of Thoracic Surgery, 3.Department of Anesthesiology, PLA 88 Hospital, Tai’an 271000, Shandong, China;
2.First Sanatorium, Tai’an Military Subarea, Tai’an 271000, Shandong, China)
关键词:
主动脉内球囊反搏术; 重症冠状动脉疾病; 冠状动脉旁路移植; 围术期
Keywords:
intra-aortic balloon pump;  high-risk coronary disease;  coronary artery bypass grafting;  perioperative period
分类号:
R541.4；R654.2
DOI:
-
文献标识码:
A
摘要:
目的:探讨主动脉内球囊反搏术（IABP）在重症冠心病外科治疗围手术期应用的临床效果。方法： 回顾自2005年7月~2014年1月，作者所在科室共手术治疗的重症冠心病65例，其中应用IABP 34例，分为术前预防性应用IABP 21例，术中或术后补救性应用IABP 13例。结果： 术前预防性应用IABP组围手术期死亡率为9%低于术中或术后补救性应用IABP组(31%)，但差异未到达统计学显著水平（P=0.11）。两组IABP应用时间、体外循环时间、呼吸机辅助时间和ICU居留时间分别为：［(32±18) h vs.(55±22) h,P<0.05］；［(122±37) min vs.(167±74) min,P<0.05］；［(36±18) h vs.(60±22) h,P<0.05］和［(52±13) h vs.(57±21) h,P>0.05］。结论: 术前预防性应用IABP辅助可降低重症冠心病患者围手术期死亡率到9%，明显减少IABP应用时间、体外循环时间、术后呼吸机辅助时间。在外科治疗重症冠心病时，IABP使用适应证应当适当放宽。
Abstract:
AIM:To study the clinical experience of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) during the perioperative period in high-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: A total of 34 extreme high-risk patients who underwent CABG combined with IABP support from July 2005 to January 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups: preoperative group (21 cases) and passive group (13 cases). The rate of mortality, IABP support time, extracorporeal circulation (CPB) time, respiratory support time and ICU stay were compared between groups. RESULTS: Perioperative mortality in the preoperative group was lower than that in the passive group (6% vs. 31%) without statistical significance (P=0.11). Compared with those in the passive group, IABP support time and respiratory support time decreased significantly in preoperative group (both P<0.05) ［(32±18) h vs.(55±22) h; (122±37) min vs.(167±74) min; (36±18) h vs.(60±22) h］. No significant difference in ICU stay was found between groups (P>0.05) ［(52±13) h vs.(57±21) h］. CONCLUSION: For high-risk CABG patients, preoperative prophylactic application of IABP could decrease the perioperative mortality rate and reduce IABP support time, CPB time and respiratory support time. When high-risk patients with coronary disease are treated with CABG, the indications for IABP support should be expanded.

参考文献/References

[1]肖明第,毛建强.重症冠心病的外科治疗[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2007,14（6）:401-403.
[2]Patel NC1,Grayson AD,Jackson M,et al.The effect off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery on in-hospital mortality and morbidity[J].Eur J Cardiothoracic Surg,2002,22(2):255-260.
[3]潘燕军，陈长志.主动脉内球囊反搏在心脏外科应用失败的原因分析[J].国际心血管病杂志,2007,34（3）:218-220.
[4]Kucuker A,Cetin L,Kucuker SA,et al.Single-Centre experience with perioperative use of intraaortic balloon pump in cardiac surgery[J].Heart Lung Circ,2014,23(5):475-481.
[5]王 睿,陈 鑫,徐 明,等.术前主动置入主动脉内球囊反搏在极高危冠状动脉旁路移植患者中的应用[J].中华外科杂志,2013,51(9):808-811.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2014-02-11.
作者简介：宿学家，副主任医师，博士 Email：suxj88@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2014-06-05